We need more stringent RF radiation exposure standards in the United States. The research and science hav…

FCC public comment #26110082461 · ET Docket 13-84 · 2026-10-20

#1We need more stringent RF radiation exposure standards in the United States. The research and science hav…by Shanea Harpe » 2026-10-20
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: There is an exponential rise in vertigo and tinnitus, headaches, and insomnia.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: There have also been new cancers and a brain tumor where the mesh network transmission is more concentrated due to housing density.
  • Cancer & tumors: There have also been new cancers and a brain tumor where the mesh network transmission is more concentrated due to housing density.
  • Children, schools & development: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2021.5272 Children have had seizures at school where the Wireless RF is more intense with antennas, WiFi and devices in the classroom.
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: All patients and clients benefit from bioavailable magnesium to offset the magnesium depletion with the voltage-gated calcium channel dysfunction.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2021.5272 Children have had seizures at school where the Wireless RF is more intense with antennas, WiFi and devices in the classroom.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2021.5272 Children have had seizures at school where the Wireless RF is more intense with antennas, WiFi and devices in the classroom.
  • Exposure limits & testing: We need more stringent RF radiation exposure standards in the United States.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2021.5272 Children have had seizures at school where the Wireless RF is more intense with antennas, WiFi and devices in the classroom.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The research and science have been insufficient to identify and address the risks in vulnerable populations.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082461

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082461

We need more stringent RF radiation exposure standards in the United States. The research and science have been insufficient to identify and address the risks in vulnerable populations. Our rural population came under a Wide Area Network Advanced Metering Infrastructure, and there was no FCC standard to protect our citizens from public utility overreach decisions. As a health practitioner in a small clinic, I witnessed an acceleration in existing cancers near transmitters and subsequent death within months of new exposure to wireless RF. There have also been new cancers and a brain tumor where the mesh network transmission is more concentrated due to housing density. There is an exponential rise in vertigo and tinnitus, headaches, and insomnia. I witnessed sudden death of pets, including elderly cats, dogs, and an aquarium pet within weeks of AMI install. All patients and clients benefit from bioavailable magnesium to offset the magnesium depletion with the voltage-gated calcium channel dysfunction. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2021.5272 Children have had seizures at school where the Wireless RF is more intense with antennas, WiFi and devices in the classroom. The Science and oversight protection for RF impact on our children is grossly lacking.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official FCC filing.

Replies