The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on …

FCC public comment #26110079119 · ET Docket 13-84 · 2026-10-02

#1The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on …by Thom Speidel » 2026-10-02
AI summary & topic connections
  • Children, schools & development: Please consider the evidence regarding the ongoing dangers of wifi use in school classrooms.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Please consider the evidence regarding the ongoing dangers of wifi use in school classrooms.
  • Exposure limits & testing: The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Please read this report: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583 A court ruling has determined that the FCC did not properly consider the scientific evidence available when it made its decision NOT to update its human exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Please read this report: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583 A court ruling has determined that the FCC did not properly consider the scientific evidence available when it made its decision NOT to update its human exposure guidelines.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110079119

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079119

The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s. Please read this report: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583 A court ruling has determined that the FCC did not properly consider the scientific evidence available when it made its decision NOT to update its human exposure guidelines. It is inconceivable and outrageous that the FCC claims to be protecting public health while it ignores the large and growing body of science showing biological harm even at non-thermal levels. Please consider the evidence regarding the ongoing dangers of wifi use in school classrooms. Thank you, Thom Speidel

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official FCC filing.

Replies