AI summary & topic connections
- Children, schools & development:
It is time to do the right thing and update these exposure guidelines in a manner that falls in line with the current scientific data, For example this study shows how detrimental exposure is to our children (and children represent future of our country).
- Exposure limits & testing:
The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
It is time to do the right thing and update these exposure guidelines in a manner that falls in line with the current scientific data, For example this study shows how detrimental exposure is to our children (and children represent future of our country).
26110079087
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079087
The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s. It's inconceivable and outrageous that the FCC claims to be protecting public health while it ignores the large and growing body of science showing biological harm even at non-thermal levels. . The science and data is readily available and the FCC has turned a blind eye for way too many years. It is time to do the right thing and update these exposure guidelines in a manner that falls in line with the current scientific data, For example this study shows how detrimental exposure is to our children (and children represent future of our country). This is just one of a plethora of studies available on PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31927574/ The data in 1000's of studies like this show that that current guidelines are outdated nowhere near accurate for the current sea of wireless radiation we are bathed in day after day without our consent. These guidelines MUST be updated to provide the level of safety Americans should be able to expect from their government.