Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: SAR comparison

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.98 W/kg vs 1.18 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (17% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.

Side-by-side SAR values

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra reported SAR and specs
MeasurementSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Head SAR, cellular only (US)0.98 W/kg1.18 W/kg
Body SAR, cellular only (US)1.10 W/kg0.98 W/kg
Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US)1.59 W/kg1.55 W/kg
Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US)1.59 W/kg1.51 W/kg
Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US)1.20 W/kg1.22 W/kg
Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US)1.54 W/kg1.58 W/kg
Head SAR (EU, 10 g)n/a1.05 W/kg
Body SAR (EU, 10 g)n/a1.58 W/kg
Display: TypeDynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak)Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1750 nits (peak)
Display: Size6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)
Display: Resolution1440 x 3088 pixels (~500 ppi density)1440 x 3088 pixels (~500 ppi density)
Display: ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Hardware: Operating SystemAndroid 13, One UI 5.1Android 12, One UI 4.1
Hardware: ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW
Hardware: CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.70 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW
Hardware: GPUAdreno 740Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW
Battery: TypeLi-Ion 5000 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 5000 mAh, non-removable
Battery: Battery TestEndurance rating 126hEndurance rating 108h
Battery: Charging45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wirelessFast charging 45W USB Power Delivery 3.0 Fast Qi/PMA wireless charging 15W Reverse wireless charging 4.5W
Design: TypeBarBar
Design: Dimensions163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in)163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in)
Design: Weight234 g (8.25 oz)228 g / 229 g (mmWave) (8.04 oz)
Design: ColorsPhantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M EditionPhantom Black, White, Burgundy, Green, Graphite, Red, Sky Blue

Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.

Questions and answers

Which has lower head SAR, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.98 W/kg vs 1.18 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (17% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

Which has lower body SAR, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.98 W/kg vs 1.10 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (11% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.54 W/kg vs 1.58 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (3% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?

Across the six US measurements, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's highest listed value is 1.59 W/kg and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's is 1.58 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.

Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?

No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID A3LSMS918B and A3LSMS908U). Nothing on this page is estimated.

More comparisons

All phone-vs-phone pages · SAR rankings · Research library

Compare any two phones

Opens a ready-made comparison page when there is one, otherwise the interactive SAR Compare app.