Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: SAR comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.98 W/kg vs 1.18 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (17% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 0.98 W/kg | 1.18 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.10 W/kg | 0.98 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.59 W/kg | 1.55 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.59 W/kg | 1.51 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.20 W/kg | 1.22 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.54 W/kg | 1.58 W/kg |
| Head SAR (EU, 10 g) | n/a | 1.05 W/kg |
| Body SAR (EU, 10 g) | n/a | 1.58 W/kg |
| Display: Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1750 nits (peak) |
| Display: Size | 6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Display: Resolution | 1440 x 3088 pixels (~500 ppi density) | 1440 x 3088 pixels (~500 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Hardware: Operating System | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Hardware: Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| Hardware: CPU | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.70 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Hardware: GPU | Adreno 740 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| Battery: Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Battery: Battery Test | Endurance rating 126h | Endurance rating 108h |
| Battery: Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wireless | Fast charging 45W USB Power Delivery 3.0 Fast Qi/PMA wireless charging 15W Reverse wireless charging 4.5W |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) |
| Design: Weight | 234 g (8.25 oz) | 228 g / 229 g (mmWave) (8.04 oz) |
| Design: Colors | Phantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M Edition | Phantom Black, White, Burgundy, Green, Graphite, Red, Sky Blue |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.98 W/kg vs 1.18 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (17% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.98 W/kg vs 1.10 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (11% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.54 W/kg vs 1.58 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (3% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's highest listed value is 1.59 W/kg and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's is 1.58 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID A3LSMS918B and A3LSMS908U). Nothing on this page is estimated.
More comparisons
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Fe
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23
- Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max