Apple iPhone 16 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro: SAR comparison
The Apple iPhone 16 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 1.08 W/kg vs 1.13 W/kg for the Google Pixel 9 Pro (4% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Apple iPhone 16 | Google Pixel 9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.08 W/kg | 1.13 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.17 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.49 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.54 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.17 W/kg | 0.85 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.54 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Display: Type | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) | LTPO* OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Display: Size | 6.1 inches, 91.7 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 96.3 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Display: Resolution | 1179 x 2556 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1280 x 2856 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~495 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Hardware: Operating System | iOS 18 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Hardware: Chipset | Apple A18 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) |
| Hardware: CPU | Hexa-core | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Hardware: GPU | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Mali-G715 MC7 |
| Battery: Type | Li-Ion, non-removable | Li-Ion 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Battery: Charging | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min (advertised) 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired | 27W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 55% in 30 min (advertised) 21W wireless (w/ Pixel Stand) 12W wireless (w/ Qi compatible charger) Reverse wireless |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm (5.81 x 2.82 x 0.31 in) | 152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| Design: Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Design: Colors | Black, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine | Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 or the Google Pixel 9 Pro?
The Apple iPhone 16 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 1.08 W/kg vs 1.13 W/kg for the Google Pixel 9 Pro (4% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 or the Google Pixel 9 Pro?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.99 W/kg vs 1.17 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 16 (15% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Apple iPhone 16 or the Google Pixel 9 Pro?
The Apple iPhone 16 lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.54 W/kg vs 1.59 W/kg for the Google Pixel 9 Pro (3% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Apple iPhone 16's highest listed value is 1.54 W/kg and the Google Pixel 9 Pro's is 1.59 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID BCG-E8688A and A4RGEC77). Nothing on this page is estimated.
More comparisons
- Apple iPhone 16 vs Apple iPhone 17
- Apple iPhone 16 vs Apple iPhone 15
- Apple iPhone 16 vs Apple iPhone 14
- Apple iPhone 16 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Apple iPhone 16 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- Apple iPhone 16 vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Google Pixel 7 PRO
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Google Pixel 9
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Xl
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17