[Two-step exposure of biological objects to infrared laser and microwave radiation].
← Research streamTwo-step exposure effects depended on the time interval between exposures and pulse duration. The biologically active dose of microwave radiation was reported to be much lower than that of infrared laser radiation, while laser radiation induced a stronger cel…
Study snapshot
Abstract
The effect of two-step exposure of bacterial objects to infrared laser and microwave pulse radiations was studied. The effect is determined by the time interval between two excitation steps and pulse duration. It was shown that the biologically active dose of microwave radiation is much lower than that of infrared laser radiation; however, laser radiation induces a stronger cellular response. It was found that microwaves enhance the efficiency of infrared laser radiation.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Two-step exposure effects depended on the time interval between exposures and pulse duration. The biologically active dose of microwave radiation was reported to be much lower than that of infrared laser radiation, while laser radiation induced a stronger cellular response. Microwaves were found to enhance the efficiency of infrared laser radiation.
Outcomes measured
- cellular response
- biologically active dose
- efficiency of infrared laser radiation under combined/two-step exposure
Limitations
- No frequency, power, SAR, or detailed dosimetry reported in the abstract.
- No sample size or specific bacterial species/strain described in the abstract.
- Outcome measures and methods are not described in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "microwave",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "pulse duration; time interval between two excitation steps"
},
"population": "bacterial objects",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"cellular response",
"biologically active dose",
"efficiency of infrared laser radiation under combined/two-step exposure"
],
"main_findings": "Two-step exposure effects depended on the time interval between exposures and pulse duration. The biologically active dose of microwave radiation was reported to be much lower than that of infrared laser radiation, while laser radiation induced a stronger cellular response. Microwaves were found to enhance the efficiency of infrared laser radiation.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"No frequency, power, SAR, or detailed dosimetry reported in the abstract.",
"No sample size or specific bacterial species/strain described in the abstract.",
"Outcome measures and methods are not described in the abstract."
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.62,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"microwave radiation",
"infrared laser",
"two-step exposure",
"pulse radiation",
"bacteria",
"cellular response",
"dose-response",
"combined exposure"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 10418688
Related papers
- The Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation Transmitted from Routers on Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Pathogens 2022
- The Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation Transmitted from Routers on Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Pathogens 2022
- The Impact of Intraspecies Variability on Growth Rate and Cellular Metabolic Activity of Bacteria Exposed to Rotating Magnetic Field 2021
- The Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation Transmitted from Routers on Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Pathogens 2022
- Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on growth rate and morphology of bacteria. 2011
- 18 GHz electromagnetic field induces permeability of Gram-positive cocci. 2015