In Situ Assessment of Uplink Duty Cycles for 4G and 5G Wireless Communications.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5851

In situ measurements of a smartphone near a 4G/5G base-station site (Belgium) found uplink duty cycles varying by application and technology. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, duty cycles ranged from 4% to 22% for both 4G and 5G; Ping showed median duty cycles…

Study snapshot

PublicationSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

In this presented study, we measured in situ the uplink duty cycles of a smartphone for 5G NR and 4G LTE for a total of six use cases covering voice, video, and data applications. The duty cycles were assessed at ten positions near a 4G and 5G base-station site in Belgium. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, the duty cycles ranged between 4% and 22% in time, both for 4G and 5G. For 5G NR, these duty cycles resulted in a higher UL-allotted time due to time division duplexing at the 3.7 GHz frequency band. Ping showed median duty cycles of 2% for 5G NR and 50% for 4G LTE. FTP upload and iPerf resulted in duty cycles close to 100%.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 3700 MHz
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In situ measurements of a smartphone near a 4G/5G base-station site (Belgium) found uplink duty cycles varying by application and technology. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, duty cycles ranged from 4% to 22% for both 4G and 5G; Ping showed median duty cycles of 2% (5G NR) versus 50% (4G LTE); FTP upload and iPerf produced duty cycles close to 100%. For 5G NR, the reported duty cycles corresponded to higher UL-allotted time due to TDD at 3.7 GHz.

Outcomes measured

  • Uplink duty cycle (time %) for 5G NR and 4G LTE across use cases
  • UL-allotted time differences related to TDD (5G NR at 3.7 GHz)

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • Only ten measurement positions near a single 4G/5G base-station site in Belgium are described
  • Results limited to six specific use cases (voice, video, data) and the tested smartphone/network conditions
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": 3700,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Uplink duty cycle (time %) for 5G NR and 4G LTE across use cases",
    "UL-allotted time differences related to TDD (5G NR at 3.7 GHz)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In situ measurements of a smartphone near a 4G/5G base-station site (Belgium) found uplink duty cycles varying by application and technology. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, duty cycles ranged from 4% to 22% for both 4G and 5G; Ping showed median duty cycles of 2% (5G NR) versus 50% (4G LTE); FTP upload and iPerf produced duty cycles close to 100%. For 5G NR, the reported duty cycles corresponded to higher UL-allotted time due to TDD at 3.7 GHz.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in abstract",
    "Only ten measurement positions near a single 4G/5G base-station site in Belgium are described",
    "Results limited to six specific use cases (voice, video, data) and the tested smartphone/network conditions"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "in situ",
    "uplink",
    "duty cycle",
    "smartphone",
    "5G NR",
    "4G LTE",
    "TDD",
    "3.7 GHz",
    "VoLTE",
    "WhatsApp",
    "Twitch",
    "Ping",
    "FTP upload",
    "iPerf",
    "Belgium"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "5g-policy",
      "weight": 0.55,
      "reason": "Assesses 5G NR uplink duty cycles in situ, relevant to 5G exposure characterization."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3390/s24103012
PubMed: 38793866

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library