In Situ Assessment of Uplink Duty Cycles for 4G and 5G Wireless Communications.
← Research streamIn situ measurements of a smartphone near a 4G/5G base-station site (Belgium) found uplink duty cycles varying by application and technology. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, duty cycles ranged from 4% to 22% for both 4G and 5G; Ping showed median duty cycles…
Study snapshot
Abstract
In this presented study, we measured in situ the uplink duty cycles of a smartphone for 5G NR and 4G LTE for a total of six use cases covering voice, video, and data applications. The duty cycles were assessed at ten positions near a 4G and 5G base-station site in Belgium. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, the duty cycles ranged between 4% and 22% in time, both for 4G and 5G. For 5G NR, these duty cycles resulted in a higher UL-allotted time due to time division duplexing at the 3.7 GHz frequency band. Ping showed median duty cycles of 2% for 5G NR and 50% for 4G LTE. FTP upload and iPerf resulted in duty cycles close to 100%.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In situ measurements of a smartphone near a 4G/5G base-station site (Belgium) found uplink duty cycles varying by application and technology. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, duty cycles ranged from 4% to 22% for both 4G and 5G; Ping showed median duty cycles of 2% (5G NR) versus 50% (4G LTE); FTP upload and iPerf produced duty cycles close to 100%. For 5G NR, the reported duty cycles corresponded to higher UL-allotted time due to TDD at 3.7 GHz.
Outcomes measured
- Uplink duty cycle (time %) for 5G NR and 4G LTE across use cases
- UL-allotted time differences related to TDD (5G NR at 3.7 GHz)
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Only ten measurement positions near a single 4G/5G base-station site in Belgium are described
- Results limited to six specific use cases (voice, video, data) and the tested smartphone/network conditions
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "exposure_assessment",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": 3700,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Uplink duty cycle (time %) for 5G NR and 4G LTE across use cases",
"UL-allotted time differences related to TDD (5G NR at 3.7 GHz)"
],
"main_findings": "In situ measurements of a smartphone near a 4G/5G base-station site (Belgium) found uplink duty cycles varying by application and technology. For Twitch, VoLTE, and WhatsApp, duty cycles ranged from 4% to 22% for both 4G and 5G; Ping showed median duty cycles of 2% (5G NR) versus 50% (4G LTE); FTP upload and iPerf produced duty cycles close to 100%. For 5G NR, the reported duty cycles corresponded to higher UL-allotted time due to TDD at 3.7 GHz.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Only ten measurement positions near a single 4G/5G base-station site in Belgium are described",
"Results limited to six specific use cases (voice, video, data) and the tested smartphone/network conditions"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"in situ",
"uplink",
"duty cycle",
"smartphone",
"5G NR",
"4G LTE",
"TDD",
"3.7 GHz",
"VoLTE",
"WhatsApp",
"Twitch",
"Ping",
"FTP upload",
"iPerf",
"Belgium"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "5g-policy",
"weight": 0.55,
"reason": "Assesses 5G NR uplink duty cycles in situ, relevant to 5G exposure characterization."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.3390/s24103012
PubMed: 38793866
Related papers
- The Dynamics of the Radiated Field Near a Mobile Phone Connected to a 4G or 5G Network 2022
- The Dynamics of the Radiated Field Near a Mobile Phone Connected to a 4G or 5G Network 2022
- Review Antenna Design for Modern Mobile Phones: A Review 2024
- Waveforms of 4G and 5G Radiofrequency Signals: Are Differences Relevant to Biology or Health? 2024
- Mitigation measures of electromagnetic field exposure in the vicinity of high frequency welders. 2017
- Clastogenic effects of radiofrequency radiations on chromosomes of Tradescantia. 1994