Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields and N-acetylcysteine on transplantation of vitrified mouse ovarian tissue.

Electromagnetic biology and medicine · 2023 · Benefit · Low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitLow evidencePaper 5782

In vitrified ovarian transplantation, NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF groups showed significantly increased follicle numbers and more pronounced vascularization compared with sham vitrified OT. Relative expression levels of unspecified genes were significantly elevat…

Study snapshot

PublicationElectromagnetic biology and medicine · 2023
Study typeanimal
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

In this experimental study, adult female NMRI mice were randomly assigned to five groups: control ;(fresh ovarian transplantation, OT); sham ;(vitrified OT); NAC ;(vitrified OT treated with N-acetyl cysteine, NAC); EMF ;(vitrified OT treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields, PEMF); and NAC+EMF ;(vitrified OT combined with NAC and PEMF). We conducted histological assessments to evaluate follicle reservation and vascularization. Furthermore, we examined the relative expression of , and genes on days 2 and 7 after OT. Additionally, we measured total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, as well as the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX). Our results demonstrated that NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF treatments significantly increased the number of follicles. Moreover, we observed a more pronounced development of vascularization in the NAC, PEMF, and PEMF+NAC groups. The relative expression levels of , and were significantly elevated in the NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF groups. Notably, TAC levels decreased significantly in the NAC group compared to the control group. Additionally, the MDA level showed a significant decrease in the PEMF+NAC group when compared to the other groups. Overall, the combination of NAC and PEMF exhibited a synergistic effect in promoting angiogenesis and protecting against oxidative stress and inflammation during OT.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationAdult female NMRI mice (ovarian tissue transplantation model; fresh vs vitrified ovarian transplantation)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In vitrified ovarian transplantation, NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF groups showed significantly increased follicle numbers and more pronounced vascularization compared with sham vitrified OT. Relative expression levels of unspecified genes were significantly elevated in NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF groups; TAC decreased in the NAC group vs control, and MDA decreased in the PEMF+NAC group vs other groups. The authors conclude NAC+PEMF had a synergistic effect promoting angiogenesis and protection against oxidative stress/inflammation during ovarian transplantation.

Outcomes measured

  • Follicle number/reservation (histology)
  • Vascularization/angiogenesis (histology)
  • Gene expression on days 2 and 7 after ovarian transplantation (genes not specified in abstract)
  • Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)
  • Malondialdehyde (MDA)
  • Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity
  • Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity
  • Oxidative stress and inflammation markers (as described)

Limitations

  • Frequency/intensity/dose and exposure duration for PEMF not reported in abstract
  • Sample size not provided in abstract
  • Specific genes assessed are not named in the abstract
  • Animal model; generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Adult female NMRI mice (ovarian tissue transplantation model; fresh vs vitrified ovarian transplantation)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Follicle number/reservation (histology)",
    "Vascularization/angiogenesis (histology)",
    "Gene expression on days 2 and 7 after ovarian transplantation (genes not specified in abstract)",
    "Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)",
    "Malondialdehyde (MDA)",
    "Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity",
    "Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity",
    "Oxidative stress and inflammation markers (as described)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In vitrified ovarian transplantation, NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF groups showed significantly increased follicle numbers and more pronounced vascularization compared with sham vitrified OT. Relative expression levels of unspecified genes were significantly elevated in NAC, PEMF, and NAC+PEMF groups; TAC decreased in the NAC group vs control, and MDA decreased in the PEMF+NAC group vs other groups. The authors conclude NAC+PEMF had a synergistic effect promoting angiogenesis and protection against oxidative stress/inflammation during ovarian transplantation.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "Frequency/intensity/dose and exposure duration for PEMF not reported in abstract",
    "Sample size not provided in abstract",
    "Specific genes assessed are not named in the abstract",
    "Animal model; generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "pulsed electromagnetic fields",
    "PEMF",
    "N-acetylcysteine",
    "NAC",
    "vitrification",
    "ovarian tissue transplantation",
    "mouse",
    "angiogenesis",
    "vascularization",
    "oxidative stress",
    "malondialdehyde",
    "total antioxidant capacity",
    "SOD",
    "GPX"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2023.2246503
PubMed: 37573526

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library