MEASUREMENT OF EMF EXPOSURE AROUND SMALL CELL BASE STATION SITES.

Radiation protection dosimetry · 2019 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5603

A measurement program was conducted to measure EMF exposure around small cell base station sites, with results compared to relevant safety guidelines and to available data for base stations in general.

Study snapshot

PublicationRadiation protection dosimetry · 2019
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

As mobile network technologies and usage change, mobile network cells have become smaller to meet the increased demand for data throughput. Small cell base stations are frequently used as a mobile network deployment method and are predominantly installed to service areas with a high density of people and to cover a small geographical area. Various measurement programs of the electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure have been conducted around base stations in general and these results have been published. There is, however, little data available on the EMF exposure levels around small cells. A measurement program was conducted to perform EMF exposure measurements around small cell base station sites. Results are compared to the relevant safety guidelines and to available data for EMF exposure around base stations in general.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A measurement program was conducted to measure EMF exposure around small cell base station sites, with results compared to relevant safety guidelines and to available data for base stations in general.

Outcomes measured

  • EMF exposure levels around small cell base station sites
  • Comparison of measured exposure levels to relevant safety guidelines
  • Comparison of small cell exposure levels to available data for base stations in general

Limitations

  • Abstract does not report numerical results or whether guideline limits were exceeded
  • Frequency bands, measurement methods, and number of sites/measurements are not described in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "small cell base station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "EMF exposure levels around small cell base station sites",
    "Comparison of measured exposure levels to relevant safety guidelines",
    "Comparison of small cell exposure levels to available data for base stations in general"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A measurement program was conducted to measure EMF exposure around small cell base station sites, with results compared to relevant safety guidelines and to available data for base stations in general.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Abstract does not report numerical results or whether guideline limits were exceeded",
    "Frequency bands, measurement methods, and number of sites/measurements are not described in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "small cells",
    "base stations",
    "EMF exposure",
    "measurement program",
    "safety guidelines",
    "mobile networks"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.55,
      "reason": "Mentions comparison of measured exposure levels to relevant safety guidelines (likely ICNIRP/WHO-referenced)."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncy201
PubMed: 30541117

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library