Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields tuned to the ion cyclotron resonance frequency of Ca on chondrogenic differentiation.

Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 5594

Cell stimulation under the Ca ion cyclotron resonance (ICR) condition showed positive results for glycosaminoglycans and type II collagen synthesis, and increased expression of chondrogenic markers (COL2A1, SOX9, ACAN). Other electromagnetic stimulation group…

Study snapshot

PublicationJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019

Study typein_vitro

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Previous studies provide strong evidence for the therapeutic effect of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on different tissues including cartilage. Diverse exposure parameters applied in scientific reports and the unknown interacting mechanism of EMF with biological systems make EMF studies challenging. In 1985, Liboff proposed that when magnetic fields are tuned to the cyclotron resonance frequencies of critical ions, the motion of ions through cell membranes is enhanced, and thus biological effects appear. Such exposure system consists of a weak alternating magnetic field (B ) in the presence of a static magnetic field (B ) and depends on the relationship between the magnitudes of B and B and the angular frequency Ω. The purpose of the present study is to determine the chondrogenic potential of EMF with regards to pulsed EMF (PEMF) and the ion cyclotron resonance (ICR) theory. We used different stimulating systems to generate EMFs in which cells are either stimulated with ubiquitous PEMF parameters, frequently reported, or parameters tuned to satisfy the ICR for Ca (including negative and positive control groups). Chondrogenesis was analysed after 3 weeks of treatment. Cell stimulation under the ICR condition showed positive results in the context of glycosaminoglycans and type II collagen synthesis. In contrast, the other electromagnetically stimulated groups showed no changes compared with the control groups. Furthermore, gene expression assays revealed an increase in the expression of chondrogenic markers (COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN) in the ICR group. These results suggest that the Ca ICR condition can be an effective factor in inducing chondrogenesis.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typein_vitro

Effect directionmixed

PopulationNot supplied

Sample sizeNot supplied

Exposure3 weeks

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Outcomes measured

Chondrogenesis after 3 weeks of treatment
Glycosaminoglycans synthesis
Type II collagen synthesis
Gene expression of chondrogenic markers (COL2A1, SOX9, ACAN)

Limitations

Exposure parameters (e.g., field strengths, frequencies) not reported in the abstract
Sample size not reported in the abstract
In vitro model; generalizability to in vivo/clinical outcomes not addressed in the abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "in_vitro",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "other",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "3 weeks"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Chondrogenesis after 3 weeks of treatment",
    "Glycosaminoglycans synthesis",
    "Type II collagen synthesis",
    "Gene expression of chondrogenic markers (COL2A1, SOX9, ACAN)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Cell stimulation under the Ca ion cyclotron resonance (ICR) condition showed positive results for glycosaminoglycans and type II collagen synthesis, and increased expression of chondrogenic markers (COL2A1, SOX9, ACAN). Other electromagnetic stimulation groups (including ubiquitous PEMF parameters) showed no changes compared with control groups.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Exposure parameters (e.g., field strengths, frequencies) not reported in the abstract",
    "Sample size not reported in the abstract",
    "In vitro model; generalizability to in vivo/clinical outcomes not addressed in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "pulsed electromagnetic fields",
    "PEMF",
    "ion cyclotron resonance",
    "ICR",
    "calcium",
    "Ca",
    "chondrogenic differentiation",
    "chondrogenesis",
    "cartilage",
    "glycosaminoglycans",
    "type II collagen",
    "COL2A1",
    "SOX9",
    "ACAN"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/term.2829
PubMed: 30793837

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library