An Evaluation of Electromagnetic Exposure While Using Ultra-High Frequency Radiofrequency Identification (UHF RFID) Guns.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 5564

Study snapshot

PublicationSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019

Study typeexposure_assessment

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The aim is to evaluate specific absorption rate (SAR) values from exposure near handheld ultra-high frequency radiofrequency identification readers (UHF RFID guns-small electronic devices, or even portable computers with relevant accessories-emitting up to several watts of electromagnetic field (EMF) to search for RFID sensors (tags) attached to marked objects), in order to test the hypothesis that they have an insignificant environmental influence. Simulations of SAR in adult male and female models in seven exposure scenarios (gun near the head, arm, chest, hip/thigh of the operator searching for tags, or near to the chest and arm of the scanned person or a bystander). The results showed EMF exposure compliant with SAR limits for general public exposure (ICNIRP/European Recommendation 1999/519/EC) at emissions up to 1 W (reading range 3.5-11 m, depending on tag sensitivity). In the worst-case scenario, guns with a reading range exceeding 5 m (>2 W emission) may cause an SAR exceeding the general public limits in the palm of the user and the torso of the user, a bystander, or a scanned person; occupational exposure limits may be exceeded when emission >5 W. Users of electronic medical implants and pregnant women should be treated as individuals at particular risk in close proximity to guns, even at emissions of 1 W. Only UHF RFID guns emitting below 1 W may be considered as environmentally insignificant EMF sources.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment

Effect directionmixed

PopulationAdult male and female models (simulated) in scenarios involving an operator, scanned person, or bystander near handheld UHF RFID readers (guns).

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureRF

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Simulations across seven scenarios found SAR compliant with general public limits at emissions up to 1 W. In worst-case scenarios, emissions >2 W (reading range >5 m) could exceed general public SAR limits in the user’s palm and torso and in the torso of a bystander or scanned person; occupational limits may be exceeded when emission >5 W. The abstract notes particular concern for people with electronic medical implants and pregnant women in close proximity, even at 1 W.

Outcomes measured

Specific absorption rate (SAR)
Compliance with general public SAR limits (ICNIRP/European Recommendation 1999/519/EC)
Potential exceedance of occupational exposure limits

Limitations

Simulation-based assessment (no direct measurements reported in abstract)
Frequency and detailed exposure parameters not specified in abstract
Results depend on modeled scenarios and assumed device emissions/reading ranges

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "occupational",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Adult male and female models (simulated) in scenarios involving an operator, scanned person, or bystander near handheld UHF RFID readers (guns).",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Specific absorption rate (SAR)",
    "Compliance with general public SAR limits (ICNIRP/European Recommendation 1999/519/EC)",
    "Potential exceedance of occupational exposure limits"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Simulations across seven scenarios found SAR compliant with general public limits at emissions up to 1 W. In worst-case scenarios, emissions >2 W (reading range >5 m) could exceed general public SAR limits in the user’s palm and torso and in the torso of a bystander or scanned person; occupational limits may be exceeded when emission >5 W. The abstract notes particular concern for people with electronic medical implants and pregnant women in close proximity, even at 1 W.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Simulation-based assessment (no direct measurements reported in abstract)",
    "Frequency and detailed exposure parameters not specified in abstract",
    "Results depend on modeled scenarios and assumed device emissions/reading ranges"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "UHF RFID",
    "handheld reader",
    "RFID gun",
    "radiofrequency",
    "electromagnetic field",
    "specific absorption rate",
    "SAR",
    "ICNIRP",
    "European Recommendation 1999/519/EC",
    "occupational exposure",
    "bystander exposure",
    "medical implants",
    "pregnancy"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.86,
      "reason": "Assesses SAR and compliance with general public and occupational exposure limits for handheld UHF RFID guns used by operators and affecting bystanders/scanned persons."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3390/s20010202
PubMed: 31905869

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library