Case-Control Study on Occupational Exposure to Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and the Association with Meningioma.

BioMed research international · 2018 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream
No effectLow evidencePaper 5552

Using the INTEROCC ELF-EMF job-exposure matrix, no increased risk of meningioma was observed across exposure categories. In the highest cumulative exposure category (8.52+ T-years), OR was 0.9 (95% CI 0.7–1.2) with no significant linear trend (0.45), and no s…

Study snapshot

PublicationBioMed research international · 2018
Study typecase_control
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) was in 2002 classified as a possible human carcinogen, Group 2B, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer at WHO based on an increased risk for childhood leukemia. In case-control studies on brain tumors during 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 we assessed lifetime occupations in addition to exposure to different agents. The INTEROCC ELF-EMF Job-Exposure Matrix was used for associating occupations with ELF-EMF exposure (T) with meningioma. Cumulative exposure (T-years), average exposure (T), and maximum exposed job (T) were calculated. RESULTS: No increased risk for meningioma was found in any category. For cumulative exposure in the highest exposure category 8.52+ T years odds ratio (OR) = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.2, and linear trend = 0.45 were calculated. No statistically significant risks were found in different time windows. CONCLUSION: In conclusion occupational ELF-EMF was not associated with an increased risk for meningioma.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_control
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF · lifetime occupations; cumulative exposure (T-years) and time windows assessed
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Using the INTEROCC ELF-EMF job-exposure matrix, no increased risk of meningioma was observed across exposure categories. In the highest cumulative exposure category (8.52+ T-years), OR was 0.9 (95% CI 0.7–1.2) with no significant linear trend (0.45), and no statistically significant risks were found in different time windows.

Outcomes measured

  • meningioma risk
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "case_control",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "occupational",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "lifetime occupations; cumulative exposure (T-years) and time windows assessed"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "meningioma risk"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Using the INTEROCC ELF-EMF job-exposure matrix, no increased risk of meningioma was observed across exposure categories. In the highest cumulative exposure category (8.52+ T-years), OR was 0.9 (95% CI 0.7–1.2) with no significant linear trend (0.45), and no statistically significant risks were found in different time windows.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low-frequency",
    "ELF-EMF",
    "occupational exposure",
    "job-exposure matrix",
    "INTEROCC",
    "meningioma",
    "brain tumor",
    "case-control"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Study evaluates occupational ELF-EMF exposure and meningioma risk using a job-exposure matrix."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1155/2018/5912394
PubMed: 29511686

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library