Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field reduces oxidative stress during the rehabilitation of post-acute stroke patients.

Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University · 2018 · Benefit · Low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitLow evidencePaper 5522

In a comparison of 57 post-stroke patients receiving rehabilitation with ELF-EMF magnetotherapy versus rehabilitation without ELF-EMF, oxidative stress markers (TBARS, thiol groups, carbonyl groups) were reported to be significantly reduced in the ELF-EMF gro…

Study snapshot

PublicationAdvances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University · 2018
Study typeother
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the therapeutic methods used in stroke rehabilitation is magnetotherapy using extremely low frequency and variable pulse shape electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF). OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of magnetotherapy on the condition of postacute stroke patients, as measured by plasma oxidative stress markers and clinical parameters which show the progress of rehabilitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The selected 57 post-stroke patients were divided into 2 groups, those with ELFEMF therapy and those without. The level of oxidative stress in the plasma was estimated by typical markers: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), thiol groups, and carbonyl groups. The effect of ELF-EMF on the course of the patients' rehabilitation following ischemic stroke was evaluated with the use of scales of physical activity and mental state: Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). RESULTS: Our comparative analysis showed that all parameters of oxidative stress are significantly reduced during rehabilitation using ELF-EMF, compared to the control group rehabilitated only by kinesiotherapy. We also recorded much higher therapeutic benefits using magnetotherapy, which revealed a significant improvement of clinimetric parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The ELF-EMF therapy meaningfully improves the overall condition of patients through a decrease of oxidative stress markers and it significantly affects the psychophysical abilities of patients after stroke. The change in carbonyl group level correlates with the change in the degree of physical and mental disability; therefore, it could be a marker for the effectiveness of rehabilitation.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationPost-acute (post-stroke) patients following ischemic stroke
Sample size57
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In a comparison of 57 post-stroke patients receiving rehabilitation with ELF-EMF magnetotherapy versus rehabilitation without ELF-EMF, oxidative stress markers (TBARS, thiol groups, carbonyl groups) were reported to be significantly reduced in the ELF-EMF group. Clinimetric parameters (ADL, MMSE, GDS) were reported to improve significantly more with magnetotherapy than with kinesiotherapy alone, and changes in carbonyl groups correlated with changes in physical and mental disability.

Outcomes measured

  • Plasma oxidative stress markers (TBARS, thiol groups, carbonyl groups)
  • Rehabilitation/clinical scales: Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
  • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

Limitations

  • Frequency, intensity, and exposure duration parameters for ELF-EMF are not provided in the abstract.
  • Randomization/blinding and allocation procedures are not described in the abstract.
  • Follow-up duration and timing of outcome assessment are not stated in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "magnetotherapy",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Post-acute (post-stroke) patients following ischemic stroke",
  "sample_size": 57,
  "outcomes": [
    "Plasma oxidative stress markers (TBARS, thiol groups, carbonyl groups)",
    "Rehabilitation/clinical scales: Activities of Daily Living (ADL)",
    "Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)",
    "Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In a comparison of 57 post-stroke patients receiving rehabilitation with ELF-EMF magnetotherapy versus rehabilitation without ELF-EMF, oxidative stress markers (TBARS, thiol groups, carbonyl groups) were reported to be significantly reduced in the ELF-EMF group. Clinimetric parameters (ADL, MMSE, GDS) were reported to improve significantly more with magnetotherapy than with kinesiotherapy alone, and changes in carbonyl groups correlated with changes in physical and mental disability.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "Frequency, intensity, and exposure duration parameters for ELF-EMF are not provided in the abstract.",
    "Randomization/blinding and allocation procedures are not described in the abstract.",
    "Follow-up duration and timing of outcome assessment are not stated in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low frequency",
    "ELF-EMF",
    "magnetotherapy",
    "stroke rehabilitation",
    "ischemic stroke",
    "oxidative stress",
    "TBARS",
    "thiol groups",
    "carbonyl groups",
    "ADL",
    "MMSE",
    "GDS"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "rehabilitation-therapeutic-emf",
      "weight": 0.78,
      "reason": "Study evaluates ELF-EMF magnetotherapy as a rehabilitation intervention after stroke."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.17219/acem/73699
PubMed: 30024661

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library