[Hygienic standardization of electromagnetic radiation from two-channel meteorological radar stations].

Gigiena i sanitariia · 1990 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5487

The study analyzed effects of combined EMF with wavelengths of 10 and 0.8 cm at various energy current density levels on central nervous system, metabolic processes, immune resistance, and reproductive function. Based on the obtained data, maximum allowable E…

Study snapshot

PublicationGigiena i sanitariia · 1990
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

The study was designed to analyze the impact of the combined electromagnetic fields (EMF) with the wavelength of 10 and 0.8 cm and various levels of energy current density on the central nervous system, metabolic processes, immune resistance and reproductive function. Proceeding from the obtained data maximum allowable levels of EMF produced by the prospective two-channel meteorological++ radars were established.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposuremicrowave
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The study analyzed effects of combined EMF with wavelengths of 10 and 0.8 cm at various energy current density levels on central nervous system, metabolic processes, immune resistance, and reproductive function. Based on the obtained data, maximum allowable EMF levels for prospective two-channel meteorological radars were established.

Outcomes measured

  • central nervous system
  • metabolic processes
  • immune resistance
  • reproductive function
  • maximum allowable levels / hygienic standardization

Limitations

  • No population or model (human/animal/in vitro) specified in the abstract.
  • No sample size or study design details provided.
  • No quantitative exposure levels or outcome results reported in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": "meteorological radar station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "central nervous system",
    "metabolic processes",
    "immune resistance",
    "reproductive function",
    "maximum allowable levels / hygienic standardization"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The study analyzed effects of combined EMF with wavelengths of 10 and 0.8 cm at various energy current density levels on central nervous system, metabolic processes, immune resistance, and reproductive function. Based on the obtained data, maximum allowable EMF levels for prospective two-channel meteorological radars were established.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No population or model (human/animal/in vitro) specified in the abstract.",
    "No sample size or study design details provided.",
    "No quantitative exposure levels or outcome results reported in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "microwave",
    "radar",
    "meteorological radar",
    "combined electromagnetic fields",
    "energy current density",
    "hygienic standardization",
    "maximum allowable levels",
    "central nervous system",
    "metabolism",
    "immune resistance",
    "reproductive function"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.38,
      "reason": "Meteorological radar stations imply potential workplace/operational exposure context, though population is not specified."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 2283071

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library