A 50-Hz electromagnetic field impairs sleep.

Journal of sleep research · 1999 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 5372

In 18 healthy subjects, sleep during exposure to a 50 Hz/1 µT electrical field was associated with reduced total sleep time, sleep efficiency, stages 3+4 slow wave sleep, and slow wave activity compared with no exposure. Circulating melatonin, growth hormone,…

Study snapshot

PublicationJournal of sleep research · 1999
Study typeother
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

In view of reports of health problems induced by low frequency (50-60 Hz) electromagnetic fields (EMF), we carried out a study in 18 healthy subjects, comparing sleep with and without exposure to a 50 Hz/1 mu Tesla electrical field. We found that the EMF condition was associated with reduced: total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, stages 3 + 4 slow wave sleep (SWS), and slow wave activity (SWA). Circulating melatonin, growth hormone, prolactin, testosterone or cortisol were not affected. The results suggest that commonly occurring low frequency electromagnetic fields may interfere with sleep.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionmixed
Population18 healthy subjects
Sample size18
ExposureELF · 0.05 MHz
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In 18 healthy subjects, sleep during exposure to a 50 Hz/1 µT electrical field was associated with reduced total sleep time, sleep efficiency, stages 3+4 slow wave sleep, and slow wave activity compared with no exposure. Circulating melatonin, growth hormone, prolactin, testosterone, and cortisol were not affected.

Outcomes measured

  • Total sleep time (TST)
  • Sleep efficiency
  • Stages 3+4 slow wave sleep (SWS)
  • Slow wave activity (SWA)
  • Circulating melatonin
  • Growth hormone
  • Prolactin
  • Testosterone
  • Cortisol

Limitations

  • Small sample size (n=18)
  • Exposure duration not reported in abstract
  • Study design details (e.g., randomization/blinding/crossover) not reported in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 0.05,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "18 healthy subjects",
  "sample_size": 18,
  "outcomes": [
    "Total sleep time (TST)",
    "Sleep efficiency",
    "Stages 3+4 slow wave sleep (SWS)",
    "Slow wave activity (SWA)",
    "Circulating melatonin",
    "Growth hormone",
    "Prolactin",
    "Testosterone",
    "Cortisol"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In 18 healthy subjects, sleep during exposure to a 50 Hz/1 µT electrical field was associated with reduced total sleep time, sleep efficiency, stages 3+4 slow wave sleep, and slow wave activity compared with no exposure. Circulating melatonin, growth hormone, prolactin, testosterone, and cortisol were not affected.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Small sample size (n=18)",
    "Exposure duration not reported in abstract",
    "Study design details (e.g., randomization/blinding/crossover) not reported in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "ELF EMF",
    "50 Hz",
    "1 µT",
    "sleep",
    "slow wave sleep",
    "slow wave activity",
    "melatonin",
    "hormones"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.3,
      "reason": "Study concerns low-frequency (50 Hz) EMF exposure, which can be relevant to occupational/environmental ELF exposure contexts, though the source is not specified in the abstract."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1999.00100.x
PubMed: 10188140

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library