Effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on the EEG during a memory task

Neuroreport · 2000 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 5351

In 16 subjects performing an auditory memory task, exposure to a digital 902 MHz EMF significantly increased EEG power in the 8–10 Hz band only. The presence of EMF altered ERD/ERS responses across all studied frequency bands as a function of time and task ph…

Study snapshot

PublicationNeuroreport · 2000
Study typerandomized_trial
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by cellular phones on the ERD/ERS of the 4-6 Hz, 6-8 Hz, 8-10 Hz and 10-12 Hz EEG frequency bands were studied in 16 normal subjects performing an auditory memory task. All subjects performed the memory task both with and without exposure to a digital 902 MHz EMF in counterbalanced order. The exposure to EMF significantly increased EEG power in the 8-10 Hz frequency band only. Nonetheless, the presence of EMF altered the ERD/ERS responses in all studied frequency bands as a function of time and memory task (encoding vs retrieval). Our results suggest that the exposure to EMF does not alter the resting EEG per se but modifies the brain responses significantly during a memory task.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typerandomized_trial
Effect directionmixed
Population16 normal subjects
Sample size16
ExposureRF · 902 MHz
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In 16 subjects performing an auditory memory task, exposure to a digital 902 MHz EMF significantly increased EEG power in the 8–10 Hz band only. The presence of EMF altered ERD/ERS responses across all studied frequency bands as a function of time and task phase (encoding vs retrieval), and was reported not to alter resting EEG per se.

Outcomes measured

  • EEG ERD/ERS responses
  • EEG power in 4–6 Hz band
  • EEG power in 6–8 Hz band
  • EEG power in 8–10 Hz band
  • EEG power in 10–12 Hz band
  • Auditory memory task performance (encoding vs retrieval context)

Limitations

  • Small sample size (n=16)
  • Exposure duration not reported in abstract
  • SAR/exposure intensity not reported in abstract
  • Outcomes limited to EEG measures during a specific auditory memory task
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "randomized_trial",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": 902,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "16 normal subjects",
  "sample_size": 16,
  "outcomes": [
    "EEG ERD/ERS responses",
    "EEG power in 4–6 Hz band",
    "EEG power in 6–8 Hz band",
    "EEG power in 8–10 Hz band",
    "EEG power in 10–12 Hz band",
    "Auditory memory task performance (encoding vs retrieval context)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In 16 subjects performing an auditory memory task, exposure to a digital 902 MHz EMF significantly increased EEG power in the 8–10 Hz band only. The presence of EMF altered ERD/ERS responses across all studied frequency bands as a function of time and task phase (encoding vs retrieval), and was reported not to alter resting EEG per se.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Small sample size (n=16)",
    "Exposure duration not reported in abstract",
    "SAR/exposure intensity not reported in abstract",
    "Outcomes limited to EEG measures during a specific auditory memory task"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "cellular phone",
    "RF EMF",
    "902 MHz",
    "EEG",
    "ERD/ERS",
    "alpha band",
    "theta band",
    "memory task",
    "encoding",
    "retrieval"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "mobile-phones",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Study examines EMF emitted by cellular phones (902 MHz) and EEG outcomes."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200003200-00021
PubMed: 10757515

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library