Effects of power frequency alternating magnetic fields on reproduction and pre-natal development of mice.
← Research streamMice exposed to 50-Hz alternating magnetic fields at 0.5 mT or 5.0 mT (rms) showed no significant differences versus sham in implantation losses, number of live fetuses, sex ratio, fetal weight, external abnormalities, or skeletal/visceral anomalies assessed …
Study snapshot
Abstract
Three groups of ICR male and female mice were exposed to 50-Hz, sinusoidal, alternating, horizontal magnetic fields of 0.0 mT (sham), 0.5 mT and 5.0 mT (rms) for 9 and 2 weeks prior to mating for males and females, respectively, through fertilization and until cesarean sectioning. Fetuses were collected by cesarean section on the 18th day of gestation. Approximately half were randomly selected for skeletal examination and the remainder used for visceral examination. No significant differences were found between the field- and the sham-exposed groups in pre-, post- and total implantation losses; number of live fetuses; sex ratio; live fetal weight; number of externally abnormal fetuses; and numbers of fetuses with skeletal and visceral anomalies. These results suggest that exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields has no major effects on reproduction and development in mice, and do not support the association of EMF exposure with adverse reproductive effects suggested by epidemiology.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Mice exposed to 50-Hz alternating magnetic fields at 0.5 mT or 5.0 mT (rms) showed no significant differences versus sham in implantation losses, number of live fetuses, sex ratio, fetal weight, external abnormalities, or skeletal/visceral anomalies assessed on gestation day 18.
Outcomes measured
- Pre-implantation loss
- Post-implantation loss
- Total implantation loss
- Number of live fetuses
- Sex ratio
- Live fetal weight
- External abnormalities
- Skeletal anomalies
- Visceral anomalies
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in the abstract
- Details of randomization/blinding and exposure characterization beyond field strength/frequency are not described in the abstract
- Outcomes assessed up to gestation day 18 only (no postnatal follow-up described)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "Males: 9 weeks prior to mating through fertilization until cesarean section; Females: 2 weeks prior to mating through fertilization until cesarean section"
},
"population": "ICR male and female mice (fetuses assessed)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Pre-implantation loss",
"Post-implantation loss",
"Total implantation loss",
"Number of live fetuses",
"Sex ratio",
"Live fetal weight",
"External abnormalities",
"Skeletal anomalies",
"Visceral anomalies"
],
"main_findings": "Mice exposed to 50-Hz alternating magnetic fields at 0.5 mT or 5.0 mT (rms) showed no significant differences versus sham in implantation losses, number of live fetuses, sex ratio, fetal weight, external abnormalities, or skeletal/visceral anomalies assessed on gestation day 18.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in the abstract",
"Details of randomization/blinding and exposure characterization beyond field strength/frequency are not described in the abstract",
"Outcomes assessed up to gestation day 18 only (no postnatal follow-up described)"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"50 Hz",
"power frequency",
"alternating magnetic field",
"ELF",
"mice",
"reproduction",
"prenatal development",
"skeletal examination",
"visceral examination",
"implantation loss"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "elf-power-frequency",
"weight": 0.9,
"reason": "Animal study of 50-Hz (power-frequency) magnetic field exposure at 0.5 and 5.0 mT and reproductive/developmental outcomes."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.2131/jts.27.131
PubMed: 12238137
Related papers
- ELF alternating magnetic field decreases reproduction by DNA damage induction. 2013
- Effects of continuous exposure to power frequency electric fields on soybean Glycine max 2019
- Effects of power frequency electromagnetic fields on melatonin and sleep in the rat. 2012
- Electromagnetic field-induced converse cell growth during a long-term observation. 2013
- Should the threshold limit value for power frequency (60 Hz) magnetic fields be changed? Perceptions among scientists and other risk experts. 2002
- Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields. 1993