Occupational exposure to base stations-compliance with EU directive 2004/40/EC.

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE · 2006 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5124

The paper reports measurements and calculations to determine the compliance boundary for workers in a typical rooftop base station setting according to EU Directive 2004/40/EC and relevant EN standards.

Study snapshot

PublicationInternational journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE · 2006
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

The rapid growth of mobile communications has not only led to a rising number of mobile telephones. It has also made base stations essential for these services widespread on many roofs. However, not everyone is aware that working close to sources of high frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF), such as transmitter antennas for mobile phones, pagers and police, fire and other emergency services, can result in high EMF exposure. This paper deals with measurements and calculations of the compliance boundary for workers in one typical roof top base station setting according to EU Directive and other relevant EN standards.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionunclear
PopulationWorkers in a typical roof top base station setting
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The paper reports measurements and calculations to determine the compliance boundary for workers in a typical rooftop base station setting according to EU Directive 2004/40/EC and relevant EN standards.

Outcomes measured

  • Measurements and calculations of compliance boundary for occupational RF EMF exposure
  • Compliance with EU Directive 2004/40/EC and relevant EN standards

Limitations

  • No frequencies, exposure metrics, or quantitative results are provided in the abstract.
  • Sample size and number of sites/settings are not stated.
  • No health outcomes are assessed; focus is on compliance boundary determination.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "base station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Workers in a typical roof top base station setting",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Measurements and calculations of compliance boundary for occupational RF EMF exposure",
    "Compliance with EU Directive 2004/40/EC and relevant EN standards"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The paper reports measurements and calculations to determine the compliance boundary for workers in a typical rooftop base station setting according to EU Directive 2004/40/EC and relevant EN standards.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No frequencies, exposure metrics, or quantitative results are provided in the abstract.",
    "Sample size and number of sites/settings are not stated.",
    "No health outcomes are assessed; focus is on compliance boundary determination."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "occupational exposure",
    "RF EMF",
    "base stations",
    "rooftop",
    "compliance boundary",
    "EU Directive 2004/40/EC",
    "EN standards",
    "measurements",
    "calculations"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Focuses on worker exposure near rooftop base station antennas and compliance boundaries."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.35,
      "reason": "Addresses regulatory compliance with EU directive/standards relevant to EMF exposure limits."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2006.11076680
PubMed: 16790176

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library