Semi-quantitative proteomics of mammalian cells upon short-term exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.
← Research streamAcross exposures to ELF 50 Hz, UMTS 2.1 GHz, and WiFi 5.8 GHz, less than 1% of the quantitated human or mouse proteome showed small changes in protein abundance. Network-based analyses did not detect significantly perturbed cellular processes or pathways in r…
Study snapshot
Abstract
The potential effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs), such as those emitted by power-lines (in extremely low frequency range), mobile cellular systems and wireless networking devices (in radio frequency range) on human health have been intensively researched and debated. However, how exposure to these EMFs may lead to biological changes underlying possible health effects is still unclear. To reveal EMF-induced molecular changes, unbiased experiments (without a priori focusing on specific biological processes) with sensitive readouts are required. We present the first proteome-wide semi-quantitative mass spectrometry analysis of human fibroblasts, osteosarcomas and mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to three types of non-ionizing EMFs (ELF 50 Hz, UMTS 2.1 GHz and WiFi 5.8 GHz). We performed controlled in vitro EMF exposures of metabolically labeled mammalian cells followed by reliable statistical analyses of differential protein- and pathway-level regulations using an array of established bioinformatics methods. Our results indicate that less than 1% of the quantitated human or mouse proteome responds to the EMFs by small changes in protein abundance. Further network-based analysis of the differentially regulated proteins did not detect significantly perturbed cellular processes or pathways in human and mouse cells in response to ELF, UMTS or WiFi exposure. In conclusion, our extensive bioinformatics analyses of semi-quantitative mass spectrometry data do not support the notion that the short-time exposures to non-ionizing EMFs have a consistent biologically significant bearing on mammalian cells in culture.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Across exposures to ELF 50 Hz, UMTS 2.1 GHz, and WiFi 5.8 GHz, less than 1% of the quantitated human or mouse proteome showed small changes in protein abundance. Network-based analyses did not detect significantly perturbed cellular processes or pathways in response to ELF, UMTS, or WiFi exposure, and the authors conclude the data do not support consistent biologically significant effects from short-term exposure in cultured mammalian cells.
Outcomes measured
- Proteome-wide protein abundance changes (semi-quantitative mass spectrometry)
- Differentially regulated proteins
- Pathway/network perturbations (bioinformatics analyses)
Limitations
- Exposure duration not specified in the abstract
- In vitro cell culture model; findings may not generalize to in vivo or human health outcomes
- Changes observed were described as small and affecting <1% of the proteome (biological significance uncertain)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF and RF",
"source": "power-lines; mobile cellular systems (UMTS); WiFi",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "short-time exposures (duration not specified)"
},
"population": "Human fibroblasts, human osteosarcoma cells, and mouse embryonic stem cells (cell culture)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Proteome-wide protein abundance changes (semi-quantitative mass spectrometry)",
"Differentially regulated proteins",
"Pathway/network perturbations (bioinformatics analyses)"
],
"main_findings": "Across exposures to ELF 50 Hz, UMTS 2.1 GHz, and WiFi 5.8 GHz, less than 1% of the quantitated human or mouse proteome showed small changes in protein abundance. Network-based analyses did not detect significantly perturbed cellular processes or pathways in response to ELF, UMTS, or WiFi exposure, and the authors conclude the data do not support consistent biologically significant effects from short-term exposure in cultured mammalian cells.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Exposure duration not specified in the abstract",
"In vitro cell culture model; findings may not generalize to in vivo or human health outcomes",
"Changes observed were described as small and affecting <1% of the proteome (biological significance uncertain)"
],
"evidence_strength": "moderate",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"non-ionizing electromagnetic fields",
"ELF",
"50 Hz",
"UMTS",
"2.1 GHz",
"WiFi",
"5.8 GHz",
"proteomics",
"mass spectrometry",
"human fibroblasts",
"osteosarcoma",
"mouse embryonic stem cells",
"bioinformatics",
"pathway analysis"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "school-wi-fi",
"weight": 0.32,
"reason": "Includes WiFi (5.8 GHz) exposure in vitro."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170762
PubMed: 28234898
Related papers
- Cellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields 2023
- Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: What research tells us about an ecosystem approach 2022
- Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: how species interact with natural and man-made EMF 2021
- Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, part 1. Rising ambient EMF levels in the environment 2021
- Electromagnetic Fields: Insight into Sources, and Their Effects on Vital Organs and the Risk of Cancer 2023
- Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children 2020