Characterisation of exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic fields in the Spanish INMA birth cohort: study protocol.

BMC public health · 2016 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 4878

This paper is a study protocol describing indirect (proximity, questionnaires, geospatial propagation models) and direct (spot, fixed longer-term, and personal) methods to characterise ELF and RF EMF-NIR exposure in INMA cohort participants aged 7–18 across h…

Study snapshot

PublicationBMC public health · 2016
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the association between exposure to electromagnetic fields of non-ionising radiation (EMF-NIR) and health in children and adolescents is hindered by the limited availability of data, mainly due to the difficulties on the exposure assessment. This study protocol describes the methodologies used for characterising exposure of children to EMF-NIR in the INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente- Environment and Childhood) Project, a prospective cohort study. METHODS/DESIGN: Indirect (proximity to emission sources, questionnaires on sources use and geospatial propagation models) and direct methods (spot and fixed longer-term measurements and personal measurements) were conducted in order to assess exposure levels of study participants aged between 7 and 18 years old. The methodology used varies depending on the frequency of the EMF-NIR and the environment (homes, schools and parks). Questionnaires assessed the use of sources contributing both to Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) and Radiofrequency (RF) exposure levels. Geospatial propagation models (NISMap) are implemented and validated for environmental outdoor sources of RFs using spot measurements. Spot and fixed longer-term ELF and RF measurements were done in the environments where children spend most of the time. Moreover, personal measurements were taken in order to assess individual exposure to RF. The exposure data are used to explore their relationships with proximity and/or use of EMF-NIR sources. DISCUSSION: Characterisation of the EMF-NIR exposure by this combination of methods is intended to overcome problems encountered in other research. The assessment of exposure of INMA cohort children and adolescents living in different regions of Spain to the full frequency range of EMF-NIR extends the characterisation of environmental exposures in this cohort. Together with other data obtained in the project, on socioeconomic and family characteristics and development of the children and adolescents, this will enable to evaluate the complex interaction between health outcomes in children and adolescents and the various environmental factors that surround them.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationChildren and adolescents in the Spanish INMA birth cohort (ages 7–18 years)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF and RF · spot and fixed longer-term measurements; personal measurements (duration not specified)
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This paper is a study protocol describing indirect (proximity, questionnaires, geospatial propagation models) and direct (spot, fixed longer-term, and personal) methods to characterise ELF and RF EMF-NIR exposure in INMA cohort participants aged 7–18 across homes, schools, and parks. It also describes implementation/validation of an RF geospatial propagation model (NISMap) using spot measurements and plans to explore relationships between measured exposure and proximity/use of sources.

Outcomes measured

  • Characterisation/assessment of exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic fields (EMF-NIR) in children and adolescents using indirect and direct methods
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF and RF",
    "source": "environmental and personal sources (homes, schools, parks); proximity to emission sources; questionnaires on source use; geospatial propagation models; spot/fixed/personal measurements",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "spot and fixed longer-term measurements; personal measurements (duration not specified)"
  },
  "population": "Children and adolescents in the Spanish INMA birth cohort (ages 7–18 years)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Characterisation/assessment of exposure to non-ionising electromagnetic fields (EMF-NIR) in children and adolescents using indirect and direct methods"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This paper is a study protocol describing indirect (proximity, questionnaires, geospatial propagation models) and direct (spot, fixed longer-term, and personal) methods to characterise ELF and RF EMF-NIR exposure in INMA cohort participants aged 7–18 across homes, schools, and parks. It also describes implementation/validation of an RF geospatial propagation model (NISMap) using spot measurements and plans to explore relationships between measured exposure and proximity/use of sources.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "EMF-NIR",
    "non-ionising radiation",
    "exposure assessment",
    "ELF",
    "radiofrequency",
    "children",
    "adolescents",
    "birth cohort",
    "INMA",
    "questionnaires",
    "geospatial propagation model",
    "NISMap",
    "spot measurements",
    "personal measurements",
    "schools",
    "homes",
    "parks"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "school-wi-fi",
      "weight": 0.32,
      "reason": "Exposure assessment includes school environments and RF sources, though specific Wi‑Fi is not explicitly mentioned."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.12,
      "reason": "General EMF exposure assessment protocol; no direct mention of WHO/ICNIRP guidance."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2825-3
PubMed: 26892951

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library