Exposure time-dependent thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on the whole body of rats.

The Journal of toxicological sciences · 2016 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 4821

Rats exposed to 2.14 GHz W-CDMA RF at whole-body averaged SAR 4 W/kg showed an approximately 1.5°C increase in core temperature that reached a plateau during exposure. At 4 W/kg, some Hsp/Hsf genes were significantly upregulated in cerebral cortex and cerebel…

Study snapshot

PublicationThe Journal of toxicological sciences · 2016
Study typeanimal
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

We investigated the thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) on the variation in core temperature and gene expression of some stress markers in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 2.14 GHz wideband code division multiple access (W-CDMA) RF signals at a whole-body averaged specific absorption rate (WBA-SAR) of 4 W/kg, which causes behavioral disruption in laboratory animals, and 0.4 W/kg, which is the limit for the occupational exposure set by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guideline. It is important to understand the possible in vivo effects derived from RF-EMF exposures at these intensities. Because of inadequate data on real-time core temperature analyses using free-moving animal and the association between stress and thermal effects of RF-EMF exposure, we analyzed the core body temperature under nonanesthetic condition during RF-EMF exposure. The results revealed that the core temperature increased by approximately 1.5°C compared with the baseline and reached a plateau till the end of RF-EMF exposure. Furthermore, we analyzed the gene expression of heat-shock proteins (Hsp) and heat-shock transcription factors (Hsf) family after RF-EMF exposure. At WBA-SAR of 4 W/kg, some Hsp and Hsf gene expression levels were significantly upregulated in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum following exposure for 6 hr/day but were not upregulated after exposure for 3 hr/day. On the other hand, there was no significant change in the core temperature and gene expression at WBA-SAR of 0.4 W/kg. Thus, 2.14-GHz RF-EMF exposure at WBA-SAR of 4 W/kg induced increases in the core temperature and upregulation of some stress markers, particularly in the cerebellum.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionmixed
PopulationSprague-Dawley rats
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 2140 MHz · 4 W/kg · 3 hr/day or 6 hr/day (also reports 0.4 W/kg condition)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Rats exposed to 2.14 GHz W-CDMA RF at whole-body averaged SAR 4 W/kg showed an approximately 1.5°C increase in core temperature that reached a plateau during exposure. At 4 W/kg, some Hsp/Hsf genes were significantly upregulated in cerebral cortex and cerebellum after 6 hr/day exposure but not after 3 hr/day; at 0.4 W/kg there were no significant changes in core temperature or gene expression.

Outcomes measured

  • Core body temperature (real-time, nonanesthetized/free-moving)
  • Gene expression of heat-shock proteins (Hsp) and heat-shock transcription factors (Hsf) in cerebral cortex and cerebellum

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in the abstract
  • Only two exposure levels reported (4 W/kg and 0.4 W/kg)
  • Gene expression outcomes limited to selected stress-marker families (Hsp/Hsf) and specific brain regions
  • Exposure duration comparison limited to 3 hr/day vs 6 hr/day (details of total study length not provided in abstract)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 2140,
    "sar_wkg": 4,
    "duration": "3 hr/day or 6 hr/day (also reports 0.4 W/kg condition)"
  },
  "population": "Sprague-Dawley rats",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Core body temperature (real-time, nonanesthetized/free-moving)",
    "Gene expression of heat-shock proteins (Hsp) and heat-shock transcription factors (Hsf) in cerebral cortex and cerebellum"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Rats exposed to 2.14 GHz W-CDMA RF at whole-body averaged SAR 4 W/kg showed an approximately 1.5°C increase in core temperature that reached a plateau during exposure. At 4 W/kg, some Hsp/Hsf genes were significantly upregulated in cerebral cortex and cerebellum after 6 hr/day exposure but not after 3 hr/day; at 0.4 W/kg there were no significant changes in core temperature or gene expression.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in the abstract",
    "Only two exposure levels reported (4 W/kg and 0.4 W/kg)",
    "Gene expression outcomes limited to selected stress-marker families (Hsp/Hsf) and specific brain regions",
    "Exposure duration comparison limited to 3 hr/day vs 6 hr/day (details of total study length not provided in abstract)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency electromagnetic fields",
    "RF-EMF",
    "2.14 GHz",
    "W-CDMA",
    "whole-body averaged SAR",
    "thermal effects",
    "core temperature",
    "heat-shock proteins",
    "Hsp",
    "heat-shock transcription factors",
    "Hsf",
    "cerebellum",
    "cerebral cortex",
    "rats"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.55,
      "reason": "Includes an exposure level described as the ICNIRP occupational limit (0.4 W/kg WBA-SAR) and compares effects at that level."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.45,
      "reason": "Explicitly references ICNIRP occupational exposure guideline limit."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.2131/jts.41.655
PubMed: 27665775

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library