Electromagnetic fields in the treatment of chronic lower back pain in patients with degenerative disc disease.

Future science OA · 2016 · Benefit · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
BenefitInsufficient evidencePaper 4807

In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, the EMF group showed improvements in overall physical health and social functioning and reductions in bodily pain versus placebo. Higher pain relief ratings at the target area and increased left latera…

Study snapshot

PublicationFuture science OA · 2016
Study typerandomized_trial
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

AIM: To examine the effects of low-amplitude, low frequency electromagnetic field therapy (EMF) therapy in patients with persistent chronic lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized and placebo controlled. INTERVENTION: EMF using a medical device resonator; control group underwent same procedures, except the device was turned off. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain reduction and mobility. RESULTS: Improvements in overall physical health, social functioning and reduction in bodily pain were observed in the EMF group. The pain relief rating scale showed a higher level of pain relief at the target area in the EMF group. An increase in left lateral mobility was seen only in the EMF group. CONCLUSION: EMF treatment may be of benefit to patients with chronic nonresponsive lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typerandomized_trial
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationPatients with persistent chronic lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, the EMF group showed improvements in overall physical health and social functioning and reductions in bodily pain versus placebo. Higher pain relief ratings at the target area and increased left lateral mobility were reported only in the EMF group.

Outcomes measured

  • Pain reduction
  • Mobility
  • Overall physical health
  • Social functioning
  • Bodily pain
  • Pain relief at target area
  • Left lateral mobility
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "randomized_trial",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "medical device",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Patients with persistent chronic lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Pain reduction",
    "Mobility",
    "Overall physical health",
    "Social functioning",
    "Bodily pain",
    "Pain relief at target area",
    "Left lateral mobility"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, the EMF group showed improvements in overall physical health and social functioning and reductions in bodily pain versus placebo. Higher pain relief ratings at the target area and increased left lateral mobility were reported only in the EMF group.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "electromagnetic field therapy",
    "low-amplitude",
    "low frequency",
    "double-blind",
    "randomized",
    "placebo-controlled",
    "chronic lower back pain",
    "degenerative disc disease",
    "pain relief",
    "mobility"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "other",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Therapeutic use of low-frequency EMF for chronic low back pain; not clearly tied to common exposure/policy hubs."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2015-0019
PubMed: 28031951

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library