In vitro effect of cell phone radiation on motility, DNA fragmentation and clusterin gene expression in human sperm.
← Research streamCompared with non-exposed aliquots, semen samples exposed in vitro to cell phone RF-EMF for 1 hour showed decreased sperm motility measures and acrosin activity and increased sperm DNA fragmentation, CLU gene expression, and CLU protein levels (p<0.05). Effec…
Study snapshot
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of cellular phones emitting radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) has been increased exponentially and become a part of everyday life. This study aimed to investigate the effects of in vitro RF-EMF exposure emitted from cellular phones on sperm motility index, sperm DNA fragmentation and seminal clusterin (CLU) gene expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 124 semen samples were grouped into the following main categories: i. normozoospermia (N, n=26), ii. asthenozoospermia (A, n=32), iii. asthenoteratozoospermia (AT, n=31) and iv. oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT, n=35). The same semen samples were then divided into two portions non-exposed and exposed samples to cell phone radiation for 1 hour. Before and immediately after exposure, both aliquots were subjected to different assessments for sperm motility, acrosin activity, sperm DNA fragmentation and CLU gene expression. Statistical differences were analyzed using paired t student test for comparisons between two sub-groups where p<0.05 was set as significant. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in sperm motility, sperm linear velocity, sperm linearity index, and sperm acrosin activity, whereas there was a significant increase in sperm DNA fragmentation percent, CLU gene expression and CLU protein levels in the exposed semen samples to RF-EMF compared with non-exposed samples in OAT>AT>A>N groups, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Cell phone emissions have a negative impact on exposed sperm motility index, sperm acrosin activity, sperm DNA fragmentation and seminal CLU gene expression, especially in OAT cases.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Compared with non-exposed aliquots, semen samples exposed in vitro to cell phone RF-EMF for 1 hour showed decreased sperm motility measures and acrosin activity and increased sperm DNA fragmentation, CLU gene expression, and CLU protein levels (p<0.05). Effects were reported as greatest in OAT, then AT, A, and N groups.
Outcomes measured
- Sperm motility index
- Sperm linear velocity
- Sperm linearity index
- Sperm acrosin activity
- Sperm DNA fragmentation percent
- Seminal clusterin (CLU) gene expression
- CLU protein levels
Limitations
- In vitro exposure model; may not reflect in vivo conditions
- Exposure characteristics (e.g., frequency, SAR, power density, distance) not reported in abstract
- Short exposure duration (1 hour) with immediate post-exposure assessment only
- Potential for multiple comparisons across several endpoints and subgroups; adjustment not described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "1 hour"
},
"population": "Human semen samples (normozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, asthenoteratozoospermia, oligoasthenoteratozoospermia groups)",
"sample_size": 124,
"outcomes": [
"Sperm motility index",
"Sperm linear velocity",
"Sperm linearity index",
"Sperm acrosin activity",
"Sperm DNA fragmentation percent",
"Seminal clusterin (CLU) gene expression",
"CLU protein levels"
],
"main_findings": "Compared with non-exposed aliquots, semen samples exposed in vitro to cell phone RF-EMF for 1 hour showed decreased sperm motility measures and acrosin activity and increased sperm DNA fragmentation, CLU gene expression, and CLU protein levels (p<0.05). Effects were reported as greatest in OAT, then AT, A, and N groups.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"In vitro exposure model; may not reflect in vivo conditions",
"Exposure characteristics (e.g., frequency, SAR, power density, distance) not reported in abstract",
"Short exposure duration (1 hour) with immediate post-exposure assessment only",
"Potential for multiple comparisons across several endpoints and subgroups; adjustment not described in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"RF-EMF",
"cell phone radiation",
"in vitro",
"human sperm",
"motility",
"DNA fragmentation",
"clusterin",
"CLU",
"acrosin activity",
"male fertility"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "mobile-phones-rf",
"weight": 0.9,
"reason": "Study evaluates RF-EMF emitted from cellular phones and sperm outcomes."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4217
PubMed: 25918601
Related papers
- Exposure to radiofrequency radiation emitted from mobile phone jammers adversely affects the quality of human sperm 2017
- Detrimental impact of cell phone radiation on sperm DNA integrity 2024
- Investigation of the Adverse Health Effects of Cell Phone Radiation and Propose Solutions to Minimize 2024
- Swipe Right on Male Infertility: Effect of cell phone radiation on sperm motility 2022
- Effects of 5G radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on indicators of vitality and DNA integrity of in vitro exposed boar semen 2024
- Reactive oxygen species levels and DNA fragmentation on astrocytes in primary culture after acute exposure to low intensity microwave electromagnetic field. 2010