Impact of one's own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure.
← Research streamIn a randomized cross-over commuting measurement study, uplink exposure in the reference (disabled phone) scenario was highest during train rides (1.19 mW/m^2) and lowest during rural car rides (0.001 mW/m^2). In public transport, the impact of the participan…
Study snapshot
Abstract
When moving around, mobile phones in stand-by mode periodically send data about their positions. The aim of this paper is to evaluate how personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) measurements are affected by such location updates. Exposure from a mobile phone handset (uplink) was measured during commuting by using a randomized cross-over study with three different scenarios: disabled mobile phone (reference), an activated dual-band phone and a quad-band phone. In the reference scenario, uplink exposure was highest during train rides (1.19 mW/m(2)) and lowest during car rides in rural areas (0.001 mW/m(2)). In public transports, the impact of one's own mobile phone on personal RF-EMF measurements was not observable because of high background uplink radiation from other people's mobile phone. In a car, uplink exposure with an activated phone was orders of magnitude higher compared with the reference scenario. This study demonstrates that personal RF-EMF exposure is affected by one's own mobile phone in stand-by mode because of its regular location update. Further dosimetric studies should quantify the contribution of location updates to the total RF-EMF exposure in order to clarify whether the duration of mobile phone use, the most common exposure surrogate in the epidemiological RF-EMF research, is actually an adequate exposure proxy.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In a randomized cross-over commuting measurement study, uplink exposure in the reference (disabled phone) scenario was highest during train rides (1.19 mW/m^2) and lowest during rural car rides (0.001 mW/m^2). In public transport, the impact of the participant’s own phone in stand-by mode was not observable due to high background uplink from other people’s phones, whereas in a car an activated phone produced uplink exposure orders of magnitude higher than the reference scenario. The authors conclude that personal RF-EMF exposure measurements are affected by one’s own phone in stand-by mode because of regular location updates.
Outcomes measured
- Personal RF-EMF exposure measurements (uplink) during commuting
- Uplink power density (mW/m^2) under different phone stand-by scenarios
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Frequencies/bands not quantified beyond dual-band vs quad-band
- Exposure metric limited to uplink/power density during commuting; generalizability to other settings not stated
- Background exposure from others may mask own-phone contribution in some environments
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "randomized_trial",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "during commuting (train/public transport and car; stand-by mode with periodic location updates)"
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Personal RF-EMF exposure measurements (uplink) during commuting",
"Uplink power density (mW/m^2) under different phone stand-by scenarios"
],
"main_findings": "In a randomized cross-over commuting measurement study, uplink exposure in the reference (disabled phone) scenario was highest during train rides (1.19 mW/m^2) and lowest during rural car rides (0.001 mW/m^2). In public transport, the impact of the participant’s own phone in stand-by mode was not observable due to high background uplink from other people’s phones, whereas in a car an activated phone produced uplink exposure orders of magnitude higher than the reference scenario. The authors conclude that personal RF-EMF exposure measurements are affected by one’s own phone in stand-by mode because of regular location updates.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Frequencies/bands not quantified beyond dual-band vs quad-band",
"Exposure metric limited to uplink/power density during commuting; generalizability to other settings not stated",
"Background exposure from others may mask own-phone contribution in some environments"
],
"evidence_strength": "moderate",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"RF-EMF",
"personal exposure measurement",
"mobile phone",
"stand-by mode",
"location update",
"uplink",
"commuting",
"randomized cross-over",
"power density"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.97
PubMed: 23093102
Related papers
- RF exposure survey of children and adults: First results from Slovenia 2016
- Protocol for personal RF-EMF exposure measurement studies in 5th generation telecommunication networks 2021
- Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and risk perception: A pilot experimental study 2019
- Dealing with crosstalk in electromagnetic field measurements of portable devices 2018
- Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol. 2010
- Wi-fi related radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF): a pilot experimental study of personal exposure and risk perception. 2021