A 1-μT extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field vs. sham control for mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized study.

Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2011 · Benefit · Low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitLow evidencePaper 4475

Compared with sham, the ELF-EMF group showed a significant difference in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of the 4-week regimen (P=0.02), but not in diastolic blood pressure (P=0.21). Two participants in the ELF-EMF group reported mild h…

Study snapshot

PublicationHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2011
Study typerandomized_trial
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) on blood pressure (BP) are controversial. In this double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we examined the effects of repeated exposure to a 1-μT ELF-EMF on BP in 20 humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Subjects were randomly assigned to either the ELF-EMF group or the sham group. Subjects in the ELF-EMF group were exposed to an ELF-EMF (6- and 8 Hz, respectively, peak magnetic field 1 μT, peak electric field 10 Vm(-1)) for at least two 10- to 15-min sessions per week, over a period of 4 weeks. In the sham group, the EMF-generating apparatus was not active. We obtained systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively) measurements at registration and before and after each ELF-EMF exposure session. Subjects in the ELF-EMF and sham groups had mean ages of 52.8 and 55.1 years, and were exposed to a mean of 9.9 and 9.0 sessions, respectively. There was a significant difference between the ELF-EMF and sham groups with respect to change in SBP value between baseline and the end of the exposure regimen (P=0.02), but not with respect to change in DBP (P=0.21). There were no adverse events other than mild paresthesia of the hands of two subjects in the ELF-EMF group. Our results suggest that repeated exposure to an ELF-EMF has a BP-lowering effect on humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typerandomized_trial
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationHumans with mild-to-moderate hypertension
Sample size20
ExposureELF · At least two 10–15 min sessions per week for 4 weeks (mean 9.9 sessions in ELF-EMF group; 9.0 in sham)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Compared with sham, the ELF-EMF group showed a significant difference in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of the 4-week regimen (P=0.02), but not in diastolic blood pressure (P=0.21). Two participants in the ELF-EMF group reported mild hand paresthesia; no other adverse events were reported.

Outcomes measured

  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
  • Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
  • Adverse events (paresthesia)

Limitations

  • Small sample size (n=20)
  • Short intervention/follow-up period (4 weeks)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "randomized_trial",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "other",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "At least two 10–15 min sessions per week for 4 weeks (mean 9.9 sessions in ELF-EMF group; 9.0 in sham)"
  },
  "population": "Humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension",
  "sample_size": 20,
  "outcomes": [
    "Systolic blood pressure (SBP)",
    "Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)",
    "Adverse events (paresthesia)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Compared with sham, the ELF-EMF group showed a significant difference in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of the 4-week regimen (P=0.02), but not in diastolic blood pressure (P=0.21). Two participants in the ELF-EMF group reported mild hand paresthesia; no other adverse events were reported.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "Small sample size (n=20)",
    "Short intervention/follow-up period (4 weeks)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields",
    "ELF-EMF",
    "1 μT",
    "6 Hz",
    "8 Hz",
    "hypertension",
    "blood pressure",
    "double-blind",
    "randomized",
    "sham-controlled",
    "systolic blood pressure",
    "diastolic blood pressure",
    "paresthesia"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Study concerns health effects of ELF electromagnetic field exposure, relevant to general EMF health guidance discussions."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.246
PubMed: 21248759

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library