A 1-μT extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field vs. sham control for mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized study.
← Research streamCompared with sham, the ELF-EMF group showed a significant difference in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of the 4-week regimen (P=0.02), but not in diastolic blood pressure (P=0.21). Two participants in the ELF-EMF group reported mild h…
Study snapshot
Abstract
The effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) on blood pressure (BP) are controversial. In this double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we examined the effects of repeated exposure to a 1-μT ELF-EMF on BP in 20 humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Subjects were randomly assigned to either the ELF-EMF group or the sham group. Subjects in the ELF-EMF group were exposed to an ELF-EMF (6- and 8 Hz, respectively, peak magnetic field 1 μT, peak electric field 10 Vm(-1)) for at least two 10- to 15-min sessions per week, over a period of 4 weeks. In the sham group, the EMF-generating apparatus was not active. We obtained systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively) measurements at registration and before and after each ELF-EMF exposure session. Subjects in the ELF-EMF and sham groups had mean ages of 52.8 and 55.1 years, and were exposed to a mean of 9.9 and 9.0 sessions, respectively. There was a significant difference between the ELF-EMF and sham groups with respect to change in SBP value between baseline and the end of the exposure regimen (P=0.02), but not with respect to change in DBP (P=0.21). There were no adverse events other than mild paresthesia of the hands of two subjects in the ELF-EMF group. Our results suggest that repeated exposure to an ELF-EMF has a BP-lowering effect on humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Compared with sham, the ELF-EMF group showed a significant difference in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of the 4-week regimen (P=0.02), but not in diastolic blood pressure (P=0.21). Two participants in the ELF-EMF group reported mild hand paresthesia; no other adverse events were reported.
Outcomes measured
- Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
- Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
- Adverse events (paresthesia)
Limitations
- Small sample size (n=20)
- Short intervention/follow-up period (4 weeks)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "randomized_trial",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "other",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "At least two 10–15 min sessions per week for 4 weeks (mean 9.9 sessions in ELF-EMF group; 9.0 in sham)"
},
"population": "Humans with mild-to-moderate hypertension",
"sample_size": 20,
"outcomes": [
"Systolic blood pressure (SBP)",
"Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)",
"Adverse events (paresthesia)"
],
"main_findings": "Compared with sham, the ELF-EMF group showed a significant difference in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of the 4-week regimen (P=0.02), but not in diastolic blood pressure (P=0.21). Two participants in the ELF-EMF group reported mild hand paresthesia; no other adverse events were reported.",
"effect_direction": "benefit",
"limitations": [
"Small sample size (n=20)",
"Short intervention/follow-up period (4 weeks)"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields",
"ELF-EMF",
"1 μT",
"6 Hz",
"8 Hz",
"hypertension",
"blood pressure",
"double-blind",
"randomized",
"sham-controlled",
"systolic blood pressure",
"diastolic blood pressure",
"paresthesia"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.2,
"reason": "Study concerns health effects of ELF electromagnetic field exposure, relevant to general EMF health guidance discussions."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.246
PubMed: 21248759
Related papers
- Correlation between the Lunar Phase and Tail-Lifting Behavior of Lizards () Exposed to an Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field. 2019
- Potential influence of geomagnetic activity on blood pressure statistical fluctuations at mid-magnetic latitudes 2025
- Independent, modified, and interacting effects of long-term noise, extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields, and shift work exposures on liver enzymes 2023
- Environmental Risk Factors and Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses 2021
- Effects of ELF EMF on c-Maf, STAT6, and RORα expressions in spleen and thymus of rat 2019
- The carcinogenic potential of non-ionizing radiations: The cases of S-50 Hz MF and 1.8 GHz GSM radiofrequency radiation 2019