Non-specific physical symptoms in relation to actual and perceived proximity to mobile phone base stations and powerlines.
← Research streamIn multilevel models adjusted for demographic and residential characteristics, higher self-reported environmental sensitivity, perceived proximity to base stations and powerlines, lower perceived control, and increased avoidance (coping) behavior were associa…
Study snapshot
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence about a possible causal relationship between non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS) and exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by sources such as mobile phone base stations (BS) and powerlines is insufficient. So far little epidemiological research has been published on the contribution of psychological components to the occurrence of EMF-related NSPS. The prior objective of the current study is to explore the relative importance of actual and perceived proximity to base stations and psychological components as determinants of NSPS, adjusting for demographic, residency and area characteristics. METHODS: Analysis was performed on data obtained in a cross-sectional study on environment and health in 2006 in the Netherlands. In the current study, 3611 adult respondents (response rate: 37%) in twenty-two Dutch residential areas completed a questionnaire. Self-reported instruments included a symptom checklist and assessment of environmental and psychological characteristics. The computation of the distance between household addresses and location of base stations and powerlines was based on geo-coding. Multilevel regression models were used to test the hypotheses regarding the determinants related to the occurrence of NSPS. RESULTS: After adjustment for demographic and residential characteristics, analyses yielded a number of statistically significant associations: Increased report of NSPS was predominantly predicted by higher levels of self-reported environmental sensitivity; perceived proximity to base stations and powerlines, lower perceived control and increased avoidance (coping) behavior were also associated with NSPS. A trend towards a moderator effect of perceived environmental sensitivity on the relation between perceived proximity to BS and NSPS was verified (p = 0.055). There was no significant association between symptom occurrence and actual distance to BS or powerlines. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived proximity to BS, psychological components and socio-demographic characteristics are associated with the report of symptomatology. Actual distance to the EMF source did not show up as determinant of NSPS.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In multilevel models adjusted for demographic and residential characteristics, higher self-reported environmental sensitivity, perceived proximity to base stations and powerlines, lower perceived control, and increased avoidance (coping) behavior were associated with increased reporting of NSPS. There was no significant association between NSPS occurrence and actual distance to base stations or powerlines.
Outcomes measured
- Non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS)
- Self-reported symptom occurrence
Limitations
- Cross-sectional design
- Self-reported symptoms and psychological/environmental characteristics
- Response rate 37%
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "cross_sectional",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "mobile phone base stations and powerlines",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Adult respondents in 22 Dutch residential areas (Netherlands)",
"sample_size": 3611,
"outcomes": [
"Non-specific physical symptoms (NSPS)",
"Self-reported symptom occurrence"
],
"main_findings": "In multilevel models adjusted for demographic and residential characteristics, higher self-reported environmental sensitivity, perceived proximity to base stations and powerlines, lower perceived control, and increased avoidance (coping) behavior were associated with increased reporting of NSPS. There was no significant association between NSPS occurrence and actual distance to base stations or powerlines.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Cross-sectional design",
"Self-reported symptoms and psychological/environmental characteristics",
"Response rate 37%"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.86,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"non-specific physical symptoms",
"NSPS",
"electromagnetic fields",
"EMF",
"mobile phone base stations",
"powerlines",
"perceived proximity",
"actual distance",
"environmental sensitivity",
"perceived control",
"avoidance coping",
"multilevel regression",
"Netherlands"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.28,
"reason": "Addresses symptoms in relation to proximity to EMF sources (base stations/powerlines) and notes insufficient evidence for causality."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-421
PubMed: 21631930
Related papers
- Radiofrequency Exposure Levels from Mobile Phone Base Stations in Outdoor Environments and an Underground Shopping Mall in Japan 2021
- Use of Electrical Household Appliances and Risk of All Types of Tumours: A Case-Control Study 2025
- Do mobile phone base stations affect sleep of residents? Results from an experimental double-blind sham-controlled field study. 2010
- Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure--a questionnaire survey. 2004
- Ecological momentary assessment study of exposure to RF EMF and non-specific physical symptoms with self- declared electrosensitives 2019
- Individual variation in temporal relationships between RF exposure & physical symptoms: A new approach in studying 'electrosensitivity' 2018