Orientation of purple membrane in combined electric and magnetic fields.

FEBS letters · 1995 · Benefit · Low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitLow evidencePaper 4275

Standard preparation using a DC electric field and rapid polymerization produced relatively poor orientation of purple membrane in gels. Adding a high magnetic field (17.5 T) and increasing suspension viscosity improved orientation and resulted in a 3-fold in…

Study snapshot

PublicationFEBS letters · 1995
Study typeengineering
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The orientation of purple membrane in gels for photoelectric measurements is relatively poor, when they are prepared with the standard technique of applying a DC electric field and rapid polymerization. We have improved it by adding a high magnetic field (17.5 T) and increasing the viscosity of the membrane suspension. This process has resulted so far in a 3-fold increase of the photoelectric signals obtained. The magnetic susceptibility of purple membrane was determined.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Standard preparation using a DC electric field and rapid polymerization produced relatively poor orientation of purple membrane in gels. Adding a high magnetic field (17.5 T) and increasing suspension viscosity improved orientation and resulted in a 3-fold increase in photoelectric signals; magnetic susceptibility of purple membrane was determined.

Outcomes measured

  • orientation of purple membrane in gels
  • photoelectric signal amplitude
  • magnetic susceptibility of purple membrane

Limitations

  • No sample size or quantitative statistical details provided in the abstract.
  • Exposure parameters for the DC electric field (strength, duration) are not described in the abstract.
  • Study is on purple membrane in gels (non-human, non-animal biological material), limiting generalizability to health outcomes.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "combined electric and magnetic fields (DC electric field; high magnetic field)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "orientation of purple membrane in gels",
    "photoelectric signal amplitude",
    "magnetic susceptibility of purple membrane"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Standard preparation using a DC electric field and rapid polymerization produced relatively poor orientation of purple membrane in gels. Adding a high magnetic field (17.5 T) and increasing suspension viscosity improved orientation and resulted in a 3-fold increase in photoelectric signals; magnetic susceptibility of purple membrane was determined.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "No sample size or quantitative statistical details provided in the abstract.",
    "Exposure parameters for the DC electric field (strength, duration) are not described in the abstract.",
    "Study is on purple membrane in gels (non-human, non-animal biological material), limiting generalizability to health outcomes."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "purple membrane",
    "orientation",
    "DC electric field",
    "magnetic field",
    "17.5 T",
    "viscosity",
    "photoelectric measurements",
    "magnetic susceptibility"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01365-2
PubMed: 8549767

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library