Treatment with electromagnetic field alters the clinical course of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis--a case report.

The International journal of neuroscience · 1996 · Benefit · Very low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitVery low evidencePaper 4262

In a single patient with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis receiving experimental picotesla electromagnetic field treatment three times weekly for 12 months, the report describes symptomatic improvements (including gait, balance, tremor, bowel/bladder fu…

Study snapshot

PublicationThe International journal of neuroscience · 1996
Study typecase_report
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingVery low

Abstract

It is estimated that 10-20% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a chronic progressive (CP) course characterized by an insidious of neurological deficits followed by steady progression of disability in the absence of symptomatic remission. No therapeutic modality has shown specific efficacy in the treatment of patients with CP MS and there are no data to indicate that any pharmacologic or other modality alters the clinical course of CP MS. Treatment with picotesla electromagnetic fields (EMFs) is a highly effective modality for the symptomatic management of MS including the chronic progressive form. In addition, this treatment also appears to alter the natural course of the disease in CP patients. A 36 year-old man experienced, at the age of 31, insidious weakness in the legs and several months later developed difficulties with balance with ataxia of gait. His gait abnormality progressed slowly over the following years and at the age of 35 he was severely disabled with spastic paraparesis and ataxia using a rolling walker for ambulation and a scooter for longer distances. In particular, his disability had progressed rapidly over the six months preceding the initiation of treatment with EMFs. He as classified have CP MS and his prognosis was considered extremely unfavorable due to the degree of cerebellar and pyramidal tract involvement and the rapid course of deterioration. In July 1995 the patient began experimental treatment with EMFs. While receiving three treatment sessions a week over 12 months he experienced improvement in cerebellar functions such as gait, balance and tremor as well as bowel and bladder functions, mood, sleep and cognitive function and resolution of diplopia, blurring of vision, dysarthria, paresthesias in the hands, and fatigue. Most remarkably, there was no further progression of the disease during the course of magnetic therapy. This case illustrated that treatment with EMFs, in addition to producing symptomatic improvement, also reverses the clinical course of CP MS.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_report
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationPatient with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (36-year-old man)
Sample size1
Exposurethree treatment sessions per week over 12 months
Evidence strengthVery lowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In a single patient with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis receiving experimental picotesla electromagnetic field treatment three times weekly for 12 months, the report describes symptomatic improvements (including gait, balance, tremor, bowel/bladder function, mood, sleep, cognition, and resolution of several symptoms) and states there was no further disease progression during treatment.

Outcomes measured

  • Progression of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis
  • Gait/balance/ataxia
  • Tremor
  • Bowel and bladder function
  • Mood
  • Sleep
  • Cognitive function
  • Diplopia/visual symptoms
  • Dysarthria
  • Paresthesias in hands
  • Fatigue

Limitations

  • Single-patient case report
  • No control/comparator described
  • Experimental treatment; details of EMF parameters (e.g., frequency) not provided in abstract
  • Outcomes appear largely clinical/symptom-based without standardized measures reported in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "case_report",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "therapeutic electromagnetic field treatment (picotesla EMFs)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "three treatment sessions per week over 12 months"
  },
  "population": "Patient with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (36-year-old man)",
  "sample_size": 1,
  "outcomes": [
    "Progression of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis",
    "Gait/balance/ataxia",
    "Tremor",
    "Bowel and bladder function",
    "Mood",
    "Sleep",
    "Cognitive function",
    "Diplopia/visual symptoms",
    "Dysarthria",
    "Paresthesias in hands",
    "Fatigue"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In a single patient with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis receiving experimental picotesla electromagnetic field treatment three times weekly for 12 months, the report describes symptomatic improvements (including gait, balance, tremor, bowel/bladder function, mood, sleep, cognition, and resolution of several symptoms) and states there was no further disease progression during treatment.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "Single-patient case report",
    "No control/comparator described",
    "Experimental treatment; details of EMF parameters (e.g., frequency) not provided in abstract",
    "Outcomes appear largely clinical/symptom-based without standardized measures reported in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "very_low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "multiple sclerosis",
    "chronic progressive",
    "picotesla",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "magnetic therapy",
    "case report"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3109/00207459608999814
PubMed: 9003966

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library