Prevention and cure of complications from multiple-electrode radiofrequency treatment of liver tumors.

Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2001 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 3884

In 114 patients treated 170 times with multiple-electrode radiofrequency for liver tumors, the reported complication rate was 9.6%. Reported complications were 1 colon perforation, 4 skin burns, 5 hydrothorax cases, and 1 subcutaneous hemorrhage; no deaths du…

Study snapshot

PublicationDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2001
Study typeother
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the complication rate of multiple-electrode radiofrequency treatment of liver tumors, and their prevention and cure. METHODS: 114 patients with liver tumors were treated 170 times using multiple-electrode radiofrequency. The clinical complications and their prevention and cure were observed. RESULTS: The complication rate was 9.6%. The complications included 1 case of colon perforation, 4 cases of skin burn, 5 cases of hydrothorax, and 1 case subcutaneous hemorrhage, but none of the patient died due to these complications. CONCLUSION: The complication rate of multiple-electrode radiofrequency treatment of liver tumors is low and the complications could be prevented and cured.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionharm
PopulationPatients with liver tumors
Sample size114
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In 114 patients treated 170 times with multiple-electrode radiofrequency for liver tumors, the reported complication rate was 9.6%. Reported complications were 1 colon perforation, 4 skin burns, 5 hydrothorax cases, and 1 subcutaneous hemorrhage; no deaths due to complications were reported.

Outcomes measured

  • Clinical complications (overall complication rate)
  • Colon perforation
  • Skin burn
  • Hydrothorax
  • Subcutaneous hemorrhage
  • Mortality due to complications

Limitations

  • No details provided in abstract on study design features (e.g., randomization, control group).
  • No exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, SAR) reported.
  • Prevention/cure methods are mentioned but not described in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "medical radiofrequency ablation (multiple-electrode radiofrequency treatment)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Patients with liver tumors",
  "sample_size": 114,
  "outcomes": [
    "Clinical complications (overall complication rate)",
    "Colon perforation",
    "Skin burn",
    "Hydrothorax",
    "Subcutaneous hemorrhage",
    "Mortality due to complications"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In 114 patients treated 170 times with multiple-electrode radiofrequency for liver tumors, the reported complication rate was 9.6%. Reported complications were 1 colon perforation, 4 skin burns, 5 hydrothorax cases, and 1 subcutaneous hemorrhage; no deaths due to complications were reported.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "No details provided in abstract on study design features (e.g., randomization, control group).",
    "No exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, SAR) reported.",
    "Prevention/cure methods are mentioned but not described in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency treatment",
    "multiple-electrode",
    "liver tumors",
    "complications",
    "skin burn",
    "colon perforation",
    "hydrothorax"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1159/000050704
PubMed: 11935097

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library