Application of radiofrequency treatment in practical pain management: state of the art.

Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2002 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 3770

The article describes radiofrequency (RF) treatment as a percutaneous minimally invasive procedure used in chronic pain patients who do not respond to medical and physical therapy, noting that it is widely used but that differences in practice exist due to on…

Study snapshot

PublicationPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2002
Study typereview
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Many therapeutic interventions for chronic pain are available, and decisions about optimal management are not easy to make. Radiofrequency (RF) treatment is classified as a percutaneous minimal invasive procedure for patients who do not respond to appropriate medical and physical therapy. Although RF treatment is widely used differences in current practice exist due to ongoing controversies.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview
Effect directionunclear
PopulationPatients with chronic pain who do not respond to appropriate medical and physical therapy
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The article describes radiofrequency (RF) treatment as a percutaneous minimally invasive procedure used in chronic pain patients who do not respond to medical and physical therapy, noting that it is widely used but that differences in practice exist due to ongoing controversies.

Outcomes measured

  • pain management (chronic pain)

Limitations

  • No specific study design details, quantitative results, or effect estimates are provided in the abstract.
  • No exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, dose, duration) are reported.
  • Population characteristics and sample size are not reported.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "medical procedure (percutaneous radiofrequency treatment)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Patients with chronic pain who do not respond to appropriate medical and physical therapy",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "pain management (chronic pain)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The article describes radiofrequency (RF) treatment as a percutaneous minimally invasive procedure used in chronic pain patients who do not respond to medical and physical therapy, noting that it is widely used but that differences in practice exist due to ongoing controversies.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No specific study design details, quantitative results, or effect estimates are provided in the abstract.",
    "No exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, dose, duration) are reported.",
    "Population characteristics and sample size are not reported."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF treatment",
    "chronic pain",
    "pain management",
    "percutaneous procedure",
    "state of the art"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1046/j.1533-2500.2002.02036.x
PubMed: 17147743

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library