[Measurements of professional exposure to ELF fields in some production areas within the territory of Regione Campania and comparison with the action values according to 2004/40/CE Directive].

Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia · 2007 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream

No effectLow evidencePaper 3396

Across 400 workers in 80 areas, measured ELF magnetic field RMS values during two work shifts did not exceed the 2004/40/CE Directive action value (500 microT). The authors report 90% of values were below 500 microT and 70% of monitored jobs were below 0.4 mi…

Study snapshot

PublicationGiornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia · 2007

Study typeexposure_assessment

Reported directionNo effect

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The 2004/40/CE Directive (which should be acknowledged within April 30, 2008), introduces the Action values for the prevention of occupational risk related to Extremely Low Frequency-Magnetic Fields (ELF-MF) exposure. In the Regione Campania, the following production areas have been investigated: textiles, industrial graphics, wood, manufacturing and ceramics. We have specifically monitored exposure to ELF magnetic field values for 400 workers belonging to 80 different areas chosen among those for which an exposure could be supposed. Results have been compared to the action values indicated in the 2004/40/CE directive. Used instrumentation includes a Wandel & Goltermann EFA 300 portable field analyser with B-Field Sensor isotropic spectrum analyzer for electric and magnetic field with 5 Hz to 32 kHz bandwidth. Technical rules follow CEI 211-6 Jan-2001. All measurements have been performed in continuous within two working shifts, setting the instrument to make acquisitions every five minutes. Data have been then processed to obtain RMS values of the magnetic field per each work shift. Values found have not shown any exceeding of the action values: more specifically, 90% of values was below it (500 microT) and 70% of the monitored jobs shows an occupational exposure below 0.4 microT, which is the possible threshold proposed for the man chronic effects of ELF magnetic fields based on data coming from some epidemiological studies.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment

Effect directionno_effect

PopulationWorkers in production areas in Regione Campania (textiles, industrial graphics, wood, manufacturing, ceramics)

Sample size400

ExposureELF · continuous measurements across two working shifts; acquisitions every 5 minutes

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Outcomes measured

Measured ELF magnetic field exposure levels (RMS) during work shifts
Comparison of measured exposures with 2004/40/CE Directive action values (500 microT)
Proportion of jobs below 0.4 microT (referenced as a possible chronic-effects threshold from some epidemiological studies)

Limitations

No health outcomes were assessed; this is an exposure measurement and compliance comparison study.
Specific ELF frequency content of measured fields is not reported beyond the instrument bandwidth (5 Hz to 32 kHz).
Selection was limited to 80 areas chosen where exposure could be supposed, which may limit generalizability.

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "occupational",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "continuous measurements across two working shifts; acquisitions every 5 minutes"
  },
  "population": "Workers in production areas in Regione Campania (textiles, industrial graphics, wood, manufacturing, ceramics)",
  "sample_size": 400,
  "outcomes": [
    "Measured ELF magnetic field exposure levels (RMS) during work shifts",
    "Comparison of measured exposures with 2004/40/CE Directive action values (500 microT)",
    "Proportion of jobs below 0.4 microT (referenced as a possible chronic-effects threshold from some epidemiological studies)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Across 400 workers in 80 areas, measured ELF magnetic field RMS values during two work shifts did not exceed the 2004/40/CE Directive action value (500 microT). The authors report 90% of values were below 500 microT and 70% of monitored jobs were below 0.4 microT.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "No health outcomes were assessed; this is an exposure measurement and compliance comparison study.",
    "Specific ELF frequency content of measured fields is not reported beyond the instrument bandwidth (5 Hz to 32 kHz).",
    "Selection was limited to 80 areas chosen where exposure could be supposed, which may limit generalizability."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "occupational exposure",
    "ELF magnetic fields",
    "workplace measurements",
    "2004/40/CE Directive",
    "action values",
    "Regione Campania",
    "RMS magnetic field",
    "microtesla"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Study measures professional (workplace) exposure to ELF magnetic fields across multiple industrial sectors and compares to EU occupational action values."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 18409954

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library