Slow relaxation of magnetoresistance in AlGaAs-GaAs quantum well structures quenched in a magnetic field.
← Research streamIn selectively doped p-GaAs/AlGaAs structures, magnetoresistance showed slow relaxation after application/variation of an external magnetic field. The authors report that this slow relaxation persisted after efforts to exclude temperature fluctuation effects,…
Study snapshot
Abstract
We observed a slow relaxation of the magnetoresistance in response to an applied magnetic field in selectively doped p-GaAs-AlGaAs structures with a partially filled upper Hubbard band. We have paid special attention to excluding the effects related to temperature fluctuations. Although these effects are important, we have found that the general features of slow relaxation persist. This behavior is interpreted as related to the properties of the Coulomb glass formed by charged centers with account taken of spin correlations, which are sensitive to an external magnetic field. Variation of the magnetic field changes the numbers of the impurity complexes of different types. As a result, it affects the shape and depth of the polaron gap formed at the states belonging to the percolation cluster responsible for the conductance. The suggested model explains both the qualitative behavior and the order of magnitude of the slowly relaxing magnetoresistance.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In selectively doped p-GaAs/AlGaAs structures, magnetoresistance showed slow relaxation after application/variation of an external magnetic field. The authors report that this slow relaxation persisted after efforts to exclude temperature fluctuation effects, and interpret the behavior using a Coulomb-glass model with spin correlations affecting impurity complexes and the polaron gap relevant to conductance.
Outcomes measured
- magnetoresistance relaxation
- conductance changes
- polaron gap shape/depth (model interpretation)
Limitations
- No quantitative exposure parameters for the magnetic field are provided in the abstract (e.g., field strength, timing).
- Temperature fluctuation effects are noted as important, though the authors attempted to exclude them; residual confounding cannot be assessed from the abstract.
- No sample size or experimental replication details are provided in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "applied magnetic field",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"magnetoresistance relaxation",
"conductance changes",
"polaron gap shape/depth (model interpretation)"
],
"main_findings": "In selectively doped p-GaAs/AlGaAs structures, magnetoresistance showed slow relaxation after application/variation of an external magnetic field. The authors report that this slow relaxation persisted after efforts to exclude temperature fluctuation effects, and interpret the behavior using a Coulomb-glass model with spin correlations affecting impurity complexes and the polaron gap relevant to conductance.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"No quantitative exposure parameters for the magnetic field are provided in the abstract (e.g., field strength, timing).",
"Temperature fluctuation effects are noted as important, though the authors attempted to exclude them; residual confounding cannot be assessed from the abstract.",
"No sample size or experimental replication details are provided in the abstract."
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.66,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"magnetoresistance",
"magnetic field",
"GaAs",
"AlGaAs",
"quantum well",
"Coulomb glass",
"spin correlations",
"Hubbard band",
"polaron gap",
"percolation cluster"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/40/405301
PubMed: 21386578
Related papers
- Effects of magnetic field and pressure on the intermediate valence state of YbPd. 2010
- Electric and magnetic field pollution in near substations and investigation of anxiety and depressive 2024
- No evidence for magnetic field effects on the behaviour of Drosophila 2023
- Using TRIZ Theory to Create Prototypes to Reduce the Potential Impact of a Phone’s Magnetic Field on the Human Body 2023
- The Effects of Uniform and Nonuniform Magnetic Fields in Plant Growth: A Meta-Analysis Approach 2023
- Extremely Low Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields Exposure: Survey of Recent Findings 2023