Response identification in the extremely low frequency region of an electret condenser microphone.
← Research streamIn a specific experimental setup using a small air cell (hole drilled in a DVD plate) with a speaker and electret condenser microphone on opposite sides, the microphone captured signals in the 0.5–20 Hz range when small air leakages were allowed at the speake…
Study snapshot
Abstract
This study shows that a small electret condenser microphone connected to a notebook or a personal computer (PC) has a prominent response in the extremely low frequency region in a specific environment. It confines most acoustic waves within a tiny air cell as follows. The air cell is constructed by drilling a small hole in a digital versatile disk (DVD) plate. A small speaker and an electret condenser microphone are attached to the two sides of the hole. Thus, the acoustic energy emitted by the speaker and reaching the microphone is strong enough to actuate the diaphragm of the latter. The experiments showed that, once small air leakages are allowed on the margin of the speaker, the microphone captured the signal in the range of 0.5 to 20 Hz. Moreover, by removing the plastic cover of the microphone and attaching the microphone head to the vibration surface, the low frequency signal can be effectively captured too. Two examples are included to show the convenience of applying the microphone to pick up the low frequency vibration information of practical systems.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In a specific experimental setup using a small air cell (hole drilled in a DVD plate) with a speaker and electret condenser microphone on opposite sides, the microphone captured signals in the 0.5–20 Hz range when small air leakages were allowed at the speaker margin. Removing the microphone’s plastic cover and attaching the microphone head to a vibration surface also enabled effective capture of low-frequency signals.
Outcomes measured
- Microphone response/signal capture in extremely low frequency range (0.5–20 Hz)
- Low-frequency vibration information capture in practical systems
Limitations
- Specific environment/setup noted; generalizability not established in abstract
- No sample size or quantitative performance metrics reported in abstract
- Not a biological/health study; relevance to EMF exposure/health outcomes not addressed
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "engineering",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "other",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Microphone response/signal capture in extremely low frequency range (0.5–20 Hz)",
"Low-frequency vibration information capture in practical systems"
],
"main_findings": "In a specific experimental setup using a small air cell (hole drilled in a DVD plate) with a speaker and electret condenser microphone on opposite sides, the microphone captured signals in the 0.5–20 Hz range when small air leakages were allowed at the speaker margin. Removing the microphone’s plastic cover and attaching the microphone head to a vibration surface also enabled effective capture of low-frequency signals.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"Specific environment/setup noted; generalizability not established in abstract",
"No sample size or quantitative performance metrics reported in abstract",
"Not a biological/health study; relevance to EMF exposure/health outcomes not addressed"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electret condenser microphone",
"extremely low frequency",
"0.5–20 Hz",
"vibration measurement",
"air cell",
"speaker",
"signal capture"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.3390/s110100623
PubMed: 22346594
Related papers
- Extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) in Switzerland: From exposure monitoring to daily 2024
- Magnetic fields from indoor transformer stations and risk of cancer in adults: a cohort study 2024
- Exploring Non-Thermal Mechanisms of Biological Reactions to Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic 2024
- Ubiquitous extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields induces anxiety-like behavior: mechanistic 2024
- 50 Hz magnetic field influences caspase-3 activity and cell cycle distribution in ionizing radiation 2024
- Brain structure alterations following neonatal exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields: A 2024