Effect of 60 minutes exposure to electromagnetic field on fecundity, learning and memory, speed of movement and whole body protein of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
← Research streamExposure to EMF from four different electrical devices had no significant effect on adult fecundity. EMF exposure altered learning and memory function in larvae, with effects especially noted for those exposed to a mobile phone. Larval speed of movement diffe…
Study snapshot
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of four different electrical devices as source of electromagnetic field on fecundity, learning and memory function, speed of movement, in addition to the whole body proteins of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. The results showed that exposure to EMF has no significant effect on adult fecundity (ANOVA and Duncan's test) but alters learning and memory function in Drosophila larvae, especially those exposed to mobile phone. Highly significant differences occurred in the larval speed of movement after exposure to EMF, with maximal effect occurred for larvae exposed to mobile phone (their speed of movement increased 2.5 times of wild type). Some protein bands serve as characters for exposure to certain electrical devices which suggest that exposure to EMF may affect the whole body proteins.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Exposure to EMF from four different electrical devices had no significant effect on adult fecundity. EMF exposure altered learning and memory function in larvae, with effects especially noted for those exposed to a mobile phone. Larval speed of movement differed significantly after EMF exposure, with the largest increase reported for mobile-phone exposure (2.5× wild type). Protein band patterns differed by device, suggesting possible effects on whole-body proteins.
Outcomes measured
- fecundity
- learning
- memory
- speed of movement
- whole body proteins (protein bands)
Limitations
- Frequency and exposure metrics (e.g., field strength, SAR) not reported in abstract
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Specific devices (beyond mobile phone) not detailed in abstract
- Outcome measurement methods and blinding/randomization not described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "four different electrical devices (including mobile phone)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "60 minutes"
},
"population": "Fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) adults and larvae",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"fecundity",
"learning",
"memory",
"speed of movement",
"whole body proteins (protein bands)"
],
"main_findings": "Exposure to EMF from four different electrical devices had no significant effect on adult fecundity. EMF exposure altered learning and memory function in larvae, with effects especially noted for those exposed to a mobile phone. Larval speed of movement differed significantly after EMF exposure, with the largest increase reported for mobile-phone exposure (2.5× wild type). Protein band patterns differed by device, suggesting possible effects on whole-body proteins.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Frequency and exposure metrics (e.g., field strength, SAR) not reported in abstract",
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Specific devices (beyond mobile phone) not detailed in abstract",
"Outcome measurement methods and blinding/randomization not described in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electromagnetic field",
"electrical devices",
"mobile phone",
"Drosophila melanogaster",
"fecundity",
"learning",
"memory",
"locomotion",
"protein bands"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "mobile-phones-rf",
"weight": 0.7,
"reason": "Mobile phone identified as a source with maximal effects on larval outcomes."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.12816/0006347
PubMed: 23469637
Related papers
- Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced behavioral changes and their possible basis 2019
- Indication of Electromagnetic Field Exposure via RBF-SVM Using Time-Series Features of Zebrafish Locomotion 2020
- A novel pilot study of automatic identification of EMF radiation effect on brain using computer vision and machine learning 2020
- Effects of long-term electromagnetic field exposure on spatial learning and memory in rats. 2013
- An electromagnetic field disrupts negative geotaxis in Drosophila via a CRY-dependent pathway. 2014
- Effects of Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field on different developmental stages of Drosophila 2021