A preliminary examination of cell phone use and helping behavior.
← Research streamIn an observed helping scenario, 9% of participants who were talking on a cell phone offered help versus 72% of participants who were not talking on a cell phone. The authors conclude that cell phone use affects helping behavior.
Study snapshot
Abstract
Use of a cell phone reduces attention and increases response times. 62 people (30 men, 32 women) were confronted with a confederate wearing a large leg brace, who dropped a stack of magazines and feigned difficulty retrieving them. Among the 33 people who talked on their cell phones only 9% offered their help, whereas among the 29 people who did not talk on their cell phones, 72% offered help. The use of cell phones affects helping behavior.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In an observed helping scenario, 9% of participants who were talking on a cell phone offered help versus 72% of participants who were not talking on a cell phone. The authors conclude that cell phone use affects helping behavior.
Outcomes measured
- helping behavior (offering help to a confederate)
Limitations
- No EMF exposure metrics reported (e.g., frequency, SAR).
- Study design details (randomization, setting, blinding) not described in the abstract.
- Outcome is behavioral and may reflect distraction/attention effects rather than EMF-specific effects.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "62 people (30 men, 32 women)",
"sample_size": 62,
"outcomes": [
"helping behavior (offering help to a confederate)"
],
"main_findings": "In an observed helping scenario, 9% of participants who were talking on a cell phone offered help versus 72% of participants who were not talking on a cell phone. The authors conclude that cell phone use affects helping behavior.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"No EMF exposure metrics reported (e.g., frequency, SAR).",
"Study design details (randomization, setting, blinding) not described in the abstract.",
"Outcome is behavioral and may reflect distraction/attention effects rather than EMF-specific effects."
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"cell phone use",
"mobile phone",
"attention",
"response time",
"helping behavior",
"prosocial behavior",
"distraction"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.2466/17.21.pr0.113x31z4
PubMed: 24693829
Related papers
- Changes in pattern of presentation of patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma over two decades: Influence of cell phone use in early diagnosis 2021
- Correlation of Blood Oxidative Stress Parameters to Indoor Radiofrequency Radiation: A Cross Sectional Study in Jordan 2020
- Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child cognition at age 5 years in 3 birth cohorts 2018
- Extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and radiofrequency: Risk of childhood CNS tumors in a city with elevated ELF-MF exposure 2025
- Relationship between radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation from cellular phones and brain tumor: meta-analyses using various proxies for RF-EMR exposure-outcome assessment 2024
- Prevalence and correlates of cell phone use among Texas drivers. 2015