RF Safe

Effects of Anatomical Differences on Electromagnetic Fields, SAR, and Temperature Change.

Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part B, Magnetic resonance engineering · 2016 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 2933

Numerical simulations and a bovine-phantom experiment showed that transmit B-field distributions across different geometries/samples can be well correlated, while maximum SAR and temperature change (ΔT) can differ notably. The authors caution that relying on …

Study snapshot

PublicationConcepts in magnetic resonance. Part B, Magnetic resonance engineering · 2016
Study typeengineering
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Electromagnetic field simulations are increasingly used to assure RF safety of patients during MRI exams. In practice, however, tissue property distribution of the patient being imaged is not known, but may be represented with a pre-existing model. Repeatedly, agreement in transmit magnetic (B) field distributions between two geometries has been used to suggest agreement in heating distributions. Here we examine relative effects of anatomical differences on B distribution, Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and temperature change (ΔT). Numerical simulations were performed for a single surface coil positioned adjacent a homogeneous phantom and bovine phantom, each with slight geometric variations, and adjacent two different human body models. Experimental demonstration was performed on a bovine phantom using MR thermometry and B mapping. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that B distributions in different samples can be well correlated, while notable difference in maximum SAR and ΔT occur. This work illustrates challenges associated with utilizing simulations or experiments for RF safety assurance purposes. Reliance on B distributions alone for validation of simulations and/or experiments with a sample or subject for assurance of safety in another should be performed with caution.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionmixed
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Numerical simulations and a bovine-phantom experiment showed that transmit B-field distributions across different geometries/samples can be well correlated, while maximum SAR and temperature change (ΔT) can differ notably. The authors caution that relying on B-field agreement alone to validate RF heating/safety across different subjects or models may be inadequate.

Outcomes measured

  • Transmit magnetic (B) field distribution
  • Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)
  • Temperature change (ΔT)

Limitations

  • Tissue property distribution of actual patients is not known and may be represented with pre-existing models
  • Work focused on a single surface coil and specific phantoms/human body models; generalizability to other coils/geometries is not stated
  • Experimental demonstration was performed on a bovine phantom (not in humans)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "MRI",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Transmit magnetic (B) field distribution",
    "Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)",
    "Temperature change (ΔT)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Numerical simulations and a bovine-phantom experiment showed that transmit B-field distributions across different geometries/samples can be well correlated, while maximum SAR and temperature change (ΔT) can differ notably. The authors caution that relying on B-field agreement alone to validate RF heating/safety across different subjects or models may be inadequate.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Tissue property distribution of actual patients is not known and may be represented with pre-existing models",
    "Work focused on a single surface coil and specific phantoms/human body models; generalizability to other coils/geometries is not stated",
    "Experimental demonstration was performed on a bovine phantom (not in humans)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "MRI",
    "RF safety",
    "electromagnetic field simulations",
    "B-field mapping",
    "MR thermometry",
    "surface coil",
    "phantom",
    "anatomical differences",
    "SAR",
    "temperature change"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "mri-rf-safety",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Study evaluates RF fields, SAR, and heating (ΔT) in the context of MRI safety assurance using simulations and phantoms/human models."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.21317
PubMed: 27134586

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library