The effect of GSM-like ELF radiation on the alpha band of the human resting EEG.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2008 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 2833

In a fully counter balanced, double blind, cross-over study of 72 healthy volunteers, a decrease in the EEG alpha frequency band was observed during 20 minutes of ELF exposure, limited to the exposed hemisphere.

Study snapshot

PublicationAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2008
Study typerandomized_trial
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Mobile phone handsets such as those operating in the GSM network emit extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields ranging from DC to at least 40 kHz. As a subpart of an extended protocol, the influence of these fields on the human resting EEG has been investigated in a fully counter balanced, double blind, cross-over design study that recruited 72 healthy volunteers. A decrease in the alpha frequency band was observed during the 20 minutes of ELF exposure in the exposed hemisphere only. This result suggests that ELF fields as emitted from GSM handsets during the DTX mode may have an effect on the resting alpha band of the human EEG.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typerandomized_trial
Effect directionharm
Population72 healthy volunteers
Sample size72
ExposureELF · 20 minutes
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In a fully counter balanced, double blind, cross-over study of 72 healthy volunteers, a decrease in the EEG alpha frequency band was observed during 20 minutes of ELF exposure, limited to the exposed hemisphere.

Outcomes measured

  • Resting EEG alpha frequency band (alpha band power/activity)

Limitations

  • Exposure frequency range is broad (DC to at least 40 kHz) without further specification in the abstract
  • Outcome reporting is limited to alpha band changes; no other EEG bands or clinical outcomes described
  • Details on exposure intensity/dose and device setup are not provided in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "randomized_trial",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "20 minutes"
  },
  "population": "72 healthy volunteers",
  "sample_size": 72,
  "outcomes": [
    "Resting EEG alpha frequency band (alpha band power/activity)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In a fully counter balanced, double blind, cross-over study of 72 healthy volunteers, a decrease in the EEG alpha frequency band was observed during 20 minutes of ELF exposure, limited to the exposed hemisphere.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Exposure frequency range is broad (DC to at least 40 kHz) without further specification in the abstract",
    "Outcome reporting is limited to alpha band changes; no other EEG bands or clinical outcomes described",
    "Details on exposure intensity/dose and device setup are not provided in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "GSM",
    "mobile phone handset",
    "DTX mode",
    "extremely low frequency",
    "ELF",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "resting EEG",
    "alpha band",
    "double blind",
    "cross-over"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "mobile-phones",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Study examines ELF fields emitted from GSM mobile phone handsets and effects on human EEG."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2008.4650503
PubMed: 19164006

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library