SAR changes in a human head model for plane wave exposure (500 - 2500 MHz) and a comparison with IEEE 2005 safety limits.
← Research streamDerived external electric field values based on the largest peak average 10 g SAR in a realistic human head model were compared with IEEE and ICNIRP reference levels for plane-wave exposure at seven frequencies from 500 to 2500 MHz across multiple incident di…
Study snapshot
Abstract
In this paper, external electric field values that are derived from the largest peak average 10 g SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) results in a realistic human head model are compared with current IEEE and ICNIRP reference levels. The head is illuminated by a plane wave source at seven different frequencies ranging from 500 MHz to 2500 MHz, with five different incident directions and three polarizations. Results reveal that the presence of metallic wire spectacles reduces the external electric field levels in the region above 900 MHz. Comparison of derived electric field values shows that the current IEEE and ICNIRP safety limits provide a conservative estimate.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Derived external electric field values based on the largest peak average 10 g SAR in a realistic human head model were compared with IEEE and ICNIRP reference levels for plane-wave exposure at seven frequencies from 500 to 2500 MHz across multiple incident directions and polarizations. The presence of metallic wire spectacles reduced external electric field levels above 900 MHz. The comparison indicated that current IEEE and ICNIRP safety limits provide a conservative estimate.
Outcomes measured
- Peak average 10 g SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) in a realistic human head model
- Derived external electric field values compared with IEEE and ICNIRP reference levels
- Effect of metallic wire spectacles on external electric field levels
Limitations
- No human participants; results are based on a modeled realistic human head
- Specific numerical results for SAR and electric field levels are not provided in the abstract
- Exposure conditions are limited to plane-wave illumination with selected frequencies, directions, and polarizations
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "engineering",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "plane wave",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Peak average 10 g SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) in a realistic human head model",
"Derived external electric field values compared with IEEE and ICNIRP reference levels",
"Effect of metallic wire spectacles on external electric field levels"
],
"main_findings": "Derived external electric field values based on the largest peak average 10 g SAR in a realistic human head model were compared with IEEE and ICNIRP reference levels for plane-wave exposure at seven frequencies from 500 to 2500 MHz across multiple incident directions and polarizations. The presence of metallic wire spectacles reduced external electric field levels above 900 MHz. The comparison indicated that current IEEE and ICNIRP safety limits provide a conservative estimate.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"No human participants; results are based on a modeled realistic human head",
"Specific numerical results for SAR and electric field levels are not provided in the abstract",
"Exposure conditions are limited to plane-wave illumination with selected frequencies, directions, and polarizations"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"SAR",
"specific absorption rate",
"human head model",
"plane wave exposure",
"500 MHz",
"2500 MHz",
"IEEE safety limits",
"ICNIRP reference levels",
"electric field",
"spectacles",
"polarization",
"incident direction"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.78,
"reason": "Compares derived electric field values with ICNIRP reference levels and discusses conservativeness of limits."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1080/08327823.2007.11688580
PubMed: 19227077
Related papers
- Importance of Exposure Duration and Metrics on Correlation between RF Energy Absorption and Temperature Increase in a Human Model 2018
- SAR and temperature elevation in human head due to overexposure to mobile phone radiation with different usage patterns 2019
- Smart Electronic Device-Based Monitoring of SAR and Temperature Variations in Indoor Human Tissue 2025
- Evaluation of neonatal outcomes according to the specific absorption rate values of phones used 2024
- Assessment of the potential threats to brain health posed by the radiation from 5G sub-6 GHz base 2024
- Estimation of SAR Average in Rats during 5G NR Chronic Exposure 2024