Cyanide orientational ordering and copper electric field gradients in CuCN.N2H4.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2009 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 2787

Residual dipolar coupling measurements in 13C and 15N MAS spectra of CuCN·N2H4 were used to extract 63/65Cu quadrupole coupling constants (reported C(Q)(63Cu) = 26 ± 4 MHz). Ab initio calculations provided electric field gradient and chemical shielding tensor…

Study snapshot

PublicationPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2009
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

The measurement of residual dipolar coupling in (13)C and (15)N MAS spectra of CuCN.N(2)H(4) allows for the extraction of (63/65)Cu quadrupole coupling constants (C(Q)((63)Cu) = 26 +/- 4 MHz). Ab initio calculations were employed to determine electric field gradient and chemical shielding tensor orientations, which proved essential for the reliable analyses of residual dipolar coupled (13)C and (15)N MAS spectra. The (1)J((63)Cu,(13)C) and (1)J((63)Cu,(15)N) couplings (590 and -120 Hz, respectively) indicate that the cyanide ligands are static and their magnitudes reflect the deviation of the C-Cu-N angle when compared with other copper cyanides. The observed (13)C and (15)N spectra are most compatible with a structural model wherein the cyanides are fully orientationally ordered: [-Cu-C-N-Cu-C-N-].

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Residual dipolar coupling measurements in 13C and 15N MAS spectra of CuCN·N2H4 were used to extract 63/65Cu quadrupole coupling constants (reported C(Q)(63Cu) = 26 ± 4 MHz). Ab initio calculations provided electric field gradient and chemical shielding tensor orientations needed for analysis, and the NMR couplings supported a model with fully orientationally ordered cyanides.

Outcomes measured

  • (63/65)Cu quadrupole coupling constants
  • Electric field gradient tensor orientations
  • Chemical shielding tensor orientations
  • (1)J((63)Cu,(13)C) and (1)J((63)Cu,(15)N) couplings
  • Cyanide orientational ordering / structural model in CuCN·N2H4
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "(63/65)Cu quadrupole coupling constants",
    "Electric field gradient tensor orientations",
    "Chemical shielding tensor orientations",
    "(1)J((63)Cu,(13)C) and (1)J((63)Cu,(15)N) couplings",
    "Cyanide orientational ordering / structural model in CuCN·N2H4"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Residual dipolar coupling measurements in 13C and 15N MAS spectra of CuCN·N2H4 were used to extract 63/65Cu quadrupole coupling constants (reported C(Q)(63Cu) = 26 ± 4 MHz). Ab initio calculations provided electric field gradient and chemical shielding tensor orientations needed for analysis, and the NMR couplings supported a model with fully orientationally ordered cyanides.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "CuCN·N2H4",
    "MAS NMR",
    "residual dipolar coupling",
    "quadrupole coupling constant",
    "electric field gradient",
    "ab initio calculations",
    "cyanide orientational ordering",
    "chemical shielding tensor"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1039/b808266a
PubMed: 19290330

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library