Occupational extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure and selected cancer outcomes in a prospective Dutch cohort

Cancer Causes Control · 2014 · Mixed · Moderate evidence

← Research stream
MixedModerate evidencePaper 2748

Across three exposure metrics, no associations were observed for lung, breast, or brain cancer incidence, nor assessed subtypes, in men and women. Among men, ever having a highly ELF-MF-exposed job was significantly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (HR …

Study snapshot

PublicationCancer Causes Control · 2014
Study typecohort
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingModerate

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the association between exposure to occupational extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and the risk of a priori selected cancer outcomes within the prospective Netherlands Cohort Study. Methods: 120,852 men and women aged 55-69 years at time of enrollment in 1986 were followed up (17.3 years) for incident lung, breast and brain cancer, and hemato-lymphoproliferative malignancies. Information on occupational history and potential confounders such as sex, age, smoking, alcohol use, and attained educational level were collected at baseline through a self-administered questionnaire. Occupational ELF-MF exposure was assigned with a job-exposure matrix. Using a case-cohort approach, associations with cancer incidence were analyzed with Cox regression stratified by sex, using three exposure metrics: (1) ever had a job with low or high exposure to ELF-MF versus background, (2) duration of exposure, and (3) cumulative exposure. Results: None of the exposure metrics showed an effect on incidence for lung, breast, and brain cancer, nor any of the assessed subtypes in men and women. Of the hemato-lymphoproliferative malignancies in men, ever high exposed to ELF-MF showed a significant association with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [hazard ratio (HR) 2.15; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06-4.35] and follicular lymphoma (FL) (HR 2.78; 95 % CI 1.00-5.77). Cumulative exposure to ELF-MF showed a significant, positive association with FL but not AML among men. Conclusions: In this large prospective cohort study, we found some indications of an increased risk of AML and FL among men with occupational ELF-MF exposure. These findings warrant further investigation.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecohort
Effect directionmixed
PopulationMen and women aged 55–69 years at enrollment (1986) in the Netherlands Cohort Study
Sample size120852
ExposureELF · Follow-up 17.3 years; exposure metrics included ever exposed (low/high vs background), duration of exposure, and cumulative exposure
Evidence strengthModerateConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Across three exposure metrics, no associations were observed for lung, breast, or brain cancer incidence, nor assessed subtypes, in men and women. Among men, ever having a highly ELF-MF-exposed job was significantly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.06–4.35) and follicular lymphoma (HR 2.78; 95% CI 1.00–5.77). Cumulative ELF-MF exposure was significantly positively associated with follicular lymphoma but not acute myeloid leukemia among men.

Outcomes measured

  • Incident lung cancer
  • Incident breast cancer
  • Incident brain cancer
  • Hemato-lymphoproliferative malignancies (including acute myeloid leukemia and follicular lymphoma)

Limitations

  • Occupational ELF-MF exposure assigned using a job-exposure matrix (potential exposure misclassification)
  • Exposure and confounders collected at baseline via self-administered questionnaire
  • Significant associations reported only for specific hematologic subtypes among men; other outcomes null
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "cohort",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "occupational",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "Follow-up 17.3 years; exposure metrics included ever exposed (low/high vs background), duration of exposure, and cumulative exposure"
  },
  "population": "Men and women aged 55–69 years at enrollment (1986) in the Netherlands Cohort Study",
  "sample_size": 120852,
  "outcomes": [
    "Incident lung cancer",
    "Incident breast cancer",
    "Incident brain cancer",
    "Hemato-lymphoproliferative malignancies (including acute myeloid leukemia and follicular lymphoma)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Across three exposure metrics, no associations were observed for lung, breast, or brain cancer incidence, nor assessed subtypes, in men and women. Among men, ever having a highly ELF-MF-exposed job was significantly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.06–4.35) and follicular lymphoma (HR 2.78; 95% CI 1.00–5.77). Cumulative ELF-MF exposure was significantly positively associated with follicular lymphoma but not acute myeloid leukemia among men.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Occupational ELF-MF exposure assigned using a job-exposure matrix (potential exposure misclassification)",
    "Exposure and confounders collected at baseline via self-administered questionnaire",
    "Significant associations reported only for specific hematologic subtypes among men; other outcomes null"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "moderate",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low-frequency magnetic fields",
    "ELF-MF",
    "occupational exposure",
    "job-exposure matrix",
    "prospective cohort",
    "Netherlands Cohort Study",
    "lung cancer",
    "breast cancer",
    "brain cancer",
    "acute myeloid leukemia",
    "follicular lymphoma",
    "hemato-lymphoproliferative malignancies"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Study evaluates occupational ELF magnetic field exposure and cancer incidence in a prospective cohort."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0322-x
PubMed: 24241907

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library