Instruments and Measurement Techniques to Assess Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields

Sensors (Basel) · 2025 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream

UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 2562

The paper presents a structured framework to evaluate and select ELF-EMF measurement instruments using a weighted scoring matrix across six criteria and a logic-based decision flowchart. The framework is applied to a realistic occupational case study and is r…

Study snapshot

PublicationSensors (Basel) · 2025

Study typeengineering

Reported directionUnclear

Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Category: Instrumentation and Measurement Tags: ELF-EMF, measurement, occupational exposure, instrument selection, health risk, regulatory compliance, weighted scoring matrix DOI: 10.3390/s25154866 URL: mdpi.com Overview This study presents a comprehensive evaluation and selection framework for extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) measurement instruments. Recognizing the diversity of application environments and technical constraints, the framework addresses the challenges of selecting appropriate tools for specific scenarios. It integrates a structured, quantitative approach through a weighted scoring matrix that evaluates instrumentation across six criteria: - Monitoring duration - Sensitivity - Environmental adaptability - Biological/regulatory relevance - Usability - Cost Findings Complementing this is a logic-based flowchart that visually guides decision-making based on user-defined operational needs. The framework is applied to a realistic occupational case study, demonstrating its effectiveness in producing evidence-based, scenario-sensitive instrument recommendations. Conclusion This method provides stakeholders with a transparent and adaptable tool for ELF-EMF device selection, an important step in occupational safety and public health, especially given the connection between electromagnetic fields and potential health risks.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering

Effect directionunclear

PopulationNot supplied

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureELF

Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Outcomes measured

ELF-EMF measurement instrument evaluation/selection
Instrument selection framework (weighted scoring matrix and decision flowchart)
Occupational exposure measurement case study application

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "occupational",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "ELF-EMF measurement instrument evaluation/selection",
    "Instrument selection framework (weighted scoring matrix and decision flowchart)",
    "Occupational exposure measurement case study application"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The paper presents a structured framework to evaluate and select ELF-EMF measurement instruments using a weighted scoring matrix across six criteria and a logic-based decision flowchart. The framework is applied to a realistic occupational case study and is reported to produce scenario-sensitive instrument recommendations.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "ELF-EMF",
    "measurement",
    "instrument selection",
    "weighted scoring matrix",
    "monitoring duration",
    "sensitivity",
    "environmental adaptability",
    "regulatory relevance",
    "usability",
    "cost",
    "occupational exposure",
    "regulatory compliance"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.86,
      "reason": "Framework is applied to an occupational case study and targets occupational safety/compliance for ELF-EMF measurements."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3390/s25154866
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library