Experience of Polish Physicians on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
← Research streamIn a survey of 355 Polish physicians, both subjective and objective assessments indicated limited understanding of EMF health effects; about one third rated their knowledge as very low/low. Most respondents were unfamiliar with WHO guidelines for responding t…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Category: Epidemiology Tags: electromagnetic hypersensitivity, EMF, physicians, public health, survey, Poland, knowledge gaps DOI: 10.1109/paee68231.2025.11155985 URL: ieeexplore.ieee.org Overview The primary aim of this project was to evaluate the understanding Polish physicians have regarding electromagnetic fields (EMF), their knowledge of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), and their direct experiences with patients reporting EHS symptoms. - Researchers distributed a questionnaire both in traditional paper-based and online formats. - A total of 355 physicians from a variety of specialties and with different clinical and scientific backgrounds participated in the survey. Findings - Physicians' Knowledge: Both subjective and objective assessments showed that physicians' understanding of the health effects of EMF is limited. About one third rated their own knowledge as "very low" or "low". - Familiarity with Guidelines: Most respondents were unfamiliar with the World Health Organization's guidelines for responding to individuals who believe they are hypersensitive to EMF. - Willingness to Learn: Despite recognizing their own knowledge gaps, most physicians expressed a readiness to improve their qualifications regarding EMF and EHS. - Prevalence of EHS Encounters: EHS is encountered with alarming frequency in medical practice—almost 45% of physicians reported treating patients who attributed their symptoms to EMF. Some physicians encounter such patients several times per month or even more frequently. Conclusion These results highlight a concerning knowledge deficit among doctors about EMF and EHS, even as many patients report symptoms they connect to EMF exposure. This deficit compromises physicians' ability to assist effectively and may lead to the unintentional spread of unreliable information, increasing patient anxiety. The presence of EHS in clinical practice demonstrates the need for increased physician education and reliable public information about EMF, its risks, and potential health impacts.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In a survey of 355 Polish physicians, both subjective and objective assessments indicated limited understanding of EMF health effects; about one third rated their knowledge as very low/low. Most respondents were unfamiliar with WHO guidelines for responding to people who believe they are hypersensitive to EMF, while many expressed willingness to learn; nearly 45% reported treating patients attributing symptoms to EMF.
Outcomes measured
- Physicians' knowledge/understanding of EMF health effects (subjective and objective)
- Familiarity with WHO guidelines for responding to individuals who believe they are hypersensitive to EMF
- Willingness to improve qualifications regarding EMF/EHS
- Frequency of physicians encountering/treating patients reporting electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) symptoms
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "cross_sectional",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Polish physicians",
"sample_size": 355,
"outcomes": [
"Physicians' knowledge/understanding of EMF health effects (subjective and objective)",
"Familiarity with WHO guidelines for responding to individuals who believe they are hypersensitive to EMF",
"Willingness to improve qualifications regarding EMF/EHS",
"Frequency of physicians encountering/treating patients reporting electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) symptoms"
],
"main_findings": "In a survey of 355 Polish physicians, both subjective and objective assessments indicated limited understanding of EMF health effects; about one third rated their knowledge as very low/low. Most respondents were unfamiliar with WHO guidelines for responding to people who believe they are hypersensitive to EMF, while many expressed willingness to learn; nearly 45% reported treating patients attributing symptoms to EMF.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electromagnetic hypersensitivity",
"EHS",
"electromagnetic fields",
"EMF",
"physicians",
"survey",
"Poland",
"public health",
"knowledge gaps",
"WHO guidelines"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.62,
"reason": "Abstract reports physicians' unfamiliarity with World Health Organization guidelines for responding to individuals who believe they are hypersensitive to EMF."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1109/paee68231.2025.11155985
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: Nation-wide survey among general practitioners, occupational physicians & hygienists in the Netherlands 2016
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses 2020
- Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields--a survey among general practitioners. 2006
- The "Mainzer EMF-Wachhund": results from a watchdog project on self-reported health complaints attributed to exposure to electromagnetic fields. 2006
- Dariusz Leszczynski responds to comments of Maël Dieudonné on Leszczynski's review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). 2023
- Electrohypersensitivity: what is belief and what is known? 2025