Next-generation compact antenna for robust defense and CubeSat communication.

Scientific reports · 2026 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 2396

A miniaturized ultra-wideband antenna designed in CST Microwave Studio and realized on an FR4 substrate demonstrated measured performance across 3.4–14 GHz, including peak gain of 4.56 dBi, return loss of −28 dB, and radiation efficiency of 82.9%, with stable…

Study snapshot

PublicationScientific reports · 2026
Study typeengineering
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

The article presents a miniaturized ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna tailored for modern defense and small satellite communication requirements. Designed and optimized using CST Microwave Studio, the antenna delivers superior electromagnetic performance across both Sub-6 GHz and millimeter-wave frequency ranges. Realized on an FR4 substrate with overall dimensions of 10 × 12 × 1.5 mm³, the prototype achieves an impressive operating bandwidth of 3.4-14 GHz, equivalent to an impedance bandwidth of 121.8%. The measured results highlight a peak gain of 4.56 dBi, a return loss of -28 dB, and a radiation efficiency of 82.9%, ensuring reliable performance over a broad spectrum. With an electrical size of 0.113λ × 0.136λ × 0.017λ, the proposed design demonstrates remarkable compactness while maintaining stable radiation patterns and high efficiency. These characteristics make the antenna a strong candidate for resilient, interference-resistant, and high-performance applications in defense systems and CubeSat missions.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposuremicrowave
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A miniaturized ultra-wideband antenna designed in CST Microwave Studio and realized on an FR4 substrate demonstrated measured performance across 3.4–14 GHz, including peak gain of 4.56 dBi, return loss of −28 dB, and radiation efficiency of 82.9%, with stable radiation patterns and compact electrical size.

Outcomes measured

  • Antenna operating bandwidth (3.4–14 GHz; 121.8% impedance bandwidth)
  • Peak gain (4.56 dBi)
  • Return loss (-28 dB)
  • Radiation efficiency (82.9%)
  • Radiation pattern stability
  • Antenna size/dimensions (10×12×1.5 mm³; electrical size 0.113λ×0.136λ×0.017λ)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": "other",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Antenna operating bandwidth (3.4–14 GHz; 121.8% impedance bandwidth)",
    "Peak gain (4.56 dBi)",
    "Return loss (-28 dB)",
    "Radiation efficiency (82.9%)",
    "Radiation pattern stability",
    "Antenna size/dimensions (10×12×1.5 mm³; electrical size 0.113λ×0.136λ×0.017λ)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A miniaturized ultra-wideband antenna designed in CST Microwave Studio and realized on an FR4 substrate demonstrated measured performance across 3.4–14 GHz, including peak gain of 4.56 dBi, return loss of −28 dB, and radiation efficiency of 82.9%, with stable radiation patterns and compact electrical size.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna",
    "Sub-6 GHz",
    "millimeter-wave",
    "CubeSat",
    "defense communications",
    "CST Microwave Studio",
    "FR4 substrate",
    "bandwidth",
    "gain",
    "return loss",
    "radiation efficiency"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-37874-4
PubMed: 41652015

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library