Preterm birth among women living within 600 meters of high voltage overhead Power Lines: a case-control study
← Research streamIn this nested case-control study, 20/135 cases and 8/150 controls lived within 600 m of high-voltage power lines. Living <600 m from high-voltage power lines was associated with higher adjusted odds of spontaneous preterm birth (OR=3.28, 95% CI 1.37–7.85) an…
Study snapshot
Abstract
- Preterm birth among women living within 600 meters of high voltage overhead Power Lines: a case-control study Sadeghi T, Ahmadi A, Javadian M, Gholamian SA, Delavar MA, Esmailzadeh S, Ahmadi B, Hadighi MSH. Preterm birth among women living within 600 meters of high voltage overhead Power Lines: a case-control study. Rom J Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18. Abstract AIM: The issue of preterm birth due to exposure to magnetic fields from power lines is unclear. Exposure to electromagnetic field in uterus has been hypothesized as possible preterm birth. The aim of the present study was to determine whether living closer to high voltage power lines increased the risk of preterm labor. METHODS: In a nested case-control study, 135 cases of singleton live spontaneous preterm birth in Rohani hospital, Babol, Iran, during the period between 2013 and 2014 were studied. The 150 control subjects were singleton term live birth in the same year of birth and city of residence using randomized-digit dialing. The shortest distance to any of the high voltage power lines to the maternal residence during pregnancy was measured using ArcGIS software for every case and control. To test the association between the preterm births and the residential proximity to power lines, stepwise multiple logistic regression was used. RESULTS: There were 28 households, 20 cases (14.8%) and 8 controls (5.3%) were situated within 600 meters of a high voltage power lines. The adjusted OR for spontaneous preterm birth and birth defect in women who were living in less than 600 meters from high voltage power lines was higher compared to those living in farther distance (OR=3.28, CI: 1.37 to 7.85) and (OR=5.05, CI: 1.52 to 16.78), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, installing overhead power lines and stations within 600 meters or making overhead underground would be useful in the prevention of the both preterm birth and birth defect. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In this nested case-control study, 20/135 cases and 8/150 controls lived within 600 m of high-voltage power lines. Living <600 m from high-voltage power lines was associated with higher adjusted odds of spontaneous preterm birth (OR=3.28, 95% CI 1.37–7.85) and birth defect (OR=5.05, 95% CI 1.52–16.78) compared with living farther away.
Outcomes measured
- spontaneous preterm birth
- birth defect
Limitations
- Exposure was assessed by residential distance to power lines rather than direct magnetic-field measurements
- Potential residual confounding is not described in the abstract
- Case-control design cannot establish causality
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "case_control",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "high voltage overhead power lines",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "during pregnancy (residential proximity measured for maternal residence)"
},
"population": "Women with singleton live births in Rohani hospital, Babol, Iran (2013–2014)",
"sample_size": 285,
"outcomes": [
"spontaneous preterm birth",
"birth defect"
],
"main_findings": "In this nested case-control study, 20/135 cases and 8/150 controls lived within 600 m of high-voltage power lines. Living <600 m from high-voltage power lines was associated with higher adjusted odds of spontaneous preterm birth (OR=3.28, 95% CI 1.37–7.85) and birth defect (OR=5.05, 95% CI 1.52–16.78) compared with living farther away.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Exposure was assessed by residential distance to power lines rather than direct magnetic-field measurements",
"Potential residual confounding is not described in the abstract",
"Case-control design cannot establish causality"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"preterm birth",
"spontaneous preterm birth",
"birth defect",
"pregnancy",
"residential proximity",
"high voltage power lines",
"magnetic fields",
"electromagnetic field",
"ArcGIS",
"Iran"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0,
"reason": null
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Maternal Use of Induction Heating Cookers During Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: The Kyushu Okinawa Maternal and Child Health Study 2021
- Maternal cumulative exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, prematurity and small for gestational age: a pooled analysis of two birth cohorts 2020
- Maternal Cell Phone Use During Pregnancy, Pregnancy Duration And Fetal Growth In Four Birth Cohorts 2019
- Maternal residential proximity to sources of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and adverse birth outcomes in a UK cohort. 2014
- Impacts of smartphone radiation on pregnancy: A systematic review 2022
- Effect of Magnetic Fields during Pregnancy on Fetal Growth and Preterm Labor: A Review Article 2020