Mobile phone use, school EMF levels & related symptoms: cross-sectional survey among high school students in Turkish city

2017 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 2230

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2017

Study typecross_sectional

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Mobile phone use, school EMF levels & related symptoms: cross-sectional survey among high school students in Turkish city Durusoy R, Hassoy H, Özkurt A, Karababa AO. Mobile phone use, school electromagnetic field levels and related symptoms: a cross-sectional survey among 2150 high school students in Izmir. Environ Health. 2017 Jun 2;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0257-x. Abstract BACKGROUND: Health outcomes of electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phones and their base stations are of concern. Conducting multidisciplinary research, targeting children and exploring dose-response are recommended. Our objectives were to describe the mobile phone usage characteristics of high school students and to explore the association between mobile phone usage characteristics, high school EMF levels and self- reported symptoms. METHODS: This cross-sectional study's data were collected by a survey questionnaire and by measuring school EMF levels between November 2009 and April 2011. A sample size of 2530 was calculated from a total of 20,493 students in 26 high schools and 2150 (85.0%) were included in the analysis. The frequencies of 23 symptoms were questioned and analysed according to 16 different aspects of mobile phone use and school EMF levels, exploring also dose-response. School EMF levels were measured with Aaronia Spectran HF-4060 device. Chi square and trend tests were used for univariate and logistic regression was used for multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among participants, 2021 (94.0%) were using mobile phones and 129 (6.0%) were not. Among users, 49.4% were speaking <10 min and 52.2% were sending/receiving 75 or more messages per day. Headache, fatigue and sleep disturbances were observed respectively 1.90 (95% CI 1.30-2.77), 1.78 (1.21-2.63) and 1.53 (1.05-2.21) times more among mobile phone users. Dose-response relationships were observed especially for the number of calls per day, total duration of calls per day, total number of text messages per day, position and status of mobile phone at night and making calls while charging as exposures and headache, concentration difficulties, fatigue and sleep disturbances as general symptoms and warming of the ear and flushing as local symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between mobile phone use and especially headache, concentration difficulties, fatigue, sleep disturbances and warming of the ear showing also dose-response. We have found limited associations between vicinity to base stations and some general symptoms; however, we did not find any association with school EMF levels. Decreasing the numbers of calls and messages, decreasing the duration of calls, using earphones, keeping the phone away from the head and body and similar precautions might decrease the frequencies or prevalence of the symptoms. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecross_sectional

Effect directionmixed

PopulationHigh school students in Izmir, Turkey

Sample size2150

ExposureSurvey and school EMF measurements collected between November 2009 and April 2011

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Mobile phone users reported higher odds of headache (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.30–2.77), fatigue (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.21–2.63), and sleep disturbances (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05–2.21) compared with non-users. Dose-response relationships were reported for several mobile phone use metrics (e.g., calls/day, call duration/day, texts/day, phone position/status at night, calling while charging) with symptoms including headache, concentration difficulties, fatigue, sleep disturbances, warming of the ear, and flushing. The authors report limited associations with vicinity to base stations and some general symptoms, and no association with measured school EMF levels.

Outcomes measured

Self-reported symptoms (23 total), including headache, fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, warming of the ear, flushing
Associations with mobile phone use characteristics
Associations with vicinity to base stations
Associations with measured school EMF levels

Limitations

Cross-sectional design (associations only; temporality/causality not established)
Symptoms and mobile phone use characteristics were self-reported (potential reporting/recall bias)
Specific EMF exposure metrics (e.g., frequency bands, quantified levels) not provided in abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "cross_sectional",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "mobile phone; base station; school EMF levels",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "Survey and school EMF measurements collected between November 2009 and April 2011"
  },
  "population": "High school students in Izmir, Turkey",
  "sample_size": 2150,
  "outcomes": [
    "Self-reported symptoms (23 total), including headache, fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, warming of the ear, flushing",
    "Associations with mobile phone use characteristics",
    "Associations with vicinity to base stations",
    "Associations with measured school EMF levels"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Mobile phone users reported higher odds of headache (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.30–2.77), fatigue (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.21–2.63), and sleep disturbances (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05–2.21) compared with non-users. Dose-response relationships were reported for several mobile phone use metrics (e.g., calls/day, call duration/day, texts/day, phone position/status at night, calling while charging) with symptoms including headache, concentration difficulties, fatigue, sleep disturbances, warming of the ear, and flushing. The authors report limited associations with vicinity to base stations and some general symptoms, and no association with measured school EMF levels.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Cross-sectional design (associations only; temporality/causality not established)",
    "Symptoms and mobile phone use characteristics were self-reported (potential reporting/recall bias)",
    "Specific EMF exposure metrics (e.g., frequency bands, quantified levels) not provided in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "mobile phone use",
    "base stations",
    "school EMF levels",
    "high school students",
    "self-reported symptoms",
    "dose-response",
    "Turkey",
    "Izmir",
    "Aaronia Spectran HF-4060"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "school-wi-fi",
      "weight": 0.25,
      "reason": "Study includes measured EMF levels in schools, though not specifically Wi‑Fi."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0257-x
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library