The Prevalence of People With Restricted Access to Work in Man-Made Electromagnetic Environments

2019 · Unclear · Low evidence

← Research stream
UnclearLow evidencePaper 1809

Based on analyses of surveys, the paper assesses evidence as indicating IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence of about 5.0–30% (mild), 1.5–5.0% (moderate), and <1.5% (severe) in the general population. It estimates the prevalence of people restricted in access to work in ma…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2019
Study typereview
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The Prevalence of People With Restricted Access to Work in Man-Made Electromagnetic Environments Bevington M. The Prevalence of People With Restricted Access to Work in Man-Made Electromagnetic Environments. Journal of Environment and Health Science. Published online Jan 18, 2019. Abstract Some surveys have identified people who have restricted access to work in environments with man-made electromagnetic exposures. This study attempts to determine their prevalence, an aspect not previously investigated in its own right. It is based on analyses of the two different types of surveys of people with Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI-EMF), or Electromagnetic Hyper- Sensitivity (EHS), either of the general population or of people with IEI-EMF/EHS. In addition, there are different definitions of IEI-EMF/EHS, with a range of subconscious, mild, moderate or severe symptoms, potentially leading in three stages to hyper-sensitivity. The current evidence is assessed as indicating that, in addition to subconscious sensitivity, the prevalence of IEI-EMF/EHS is between about 5.0 and 30 per cent of the general population for mild cases, 1.5 and 5.0 per cent for moderate cases and < 1.5 per cent for severe cases. The prevalence of people restricted in their access to work in a man-made electromagnetic environment is estimated at 0.65 per cent of the general population, at about 18% of the general population with moderate IEI- EMF/EHS. The estimate of 0.65% equates to 435,500 people in the UK's population of 67 million. Some reasons for possible under-reporting are discussed. Adjustments can enable some people with this disability to remain in employment, suggesting that rates of restriction in access to work may fall as employers become aware of what adjustments are needed. Open access paper: ommegaonline.org Access-to-Work-in-Man-Made-Electromagnetic-Environments/2402

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview
Effect directionunclear
PopulationGeneral population and people with IEI-EMF/EHS (based on surveys)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

Based on analyses of surveys, the paper assesses evidence as indicating IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence of about 5.0–30% (mild), 1.5–5.0% (moderate), and <1.5% (severe) in the general population. It estimates the prevalence of people restricted in access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments at 0.65% of the general population, and about 18% among those with moderate IEI-EMF/EHS.

Outcomes measured

  • Prevalence of IEI-EMF/EHS (mild, moderate, severe)
  • Prevalence of restricted access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments

Limitations

  • Based on analyses of existing surveys rather than primary data collection
  • Different survey types and varying definitions of IEI-EMF/EHS are noted, which may affect prevalence estimates
  • Potential under-reporting is discussed but not quantified in the abstract
  • Sample sizes and survey methodologies are not described in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2019,
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "man-made electromagnetic environments",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "General population and people with IEI-EMF/EHS (based on surveys)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Prevalence of IEI-EMF/EHS (mild, moderate, severe)",
    "Prevalence of restricted access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Based on analyses of surveys, the paper assesses evidence as indicating IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence of about 5.0–30% (mild), 1.5–5.0% (moderate), and <1.5% (severe) in the general population. It estimates the prevalence of people restricted in access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments at 0.65% of the general population, and about 18% among those with moderate IEI-EMF/EHS.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Based on analyses of existing surveys rather than primary data collection",
    "Different survey types and varying definitions of IEI-EMF/EHS are noted, which may affect prevalence estimates",
    "Potential under-reporting is discussed but not quantified in the abstract",
    "Sample sizes and survey methodologies are not described in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "stance": "concern",
  "stance_confidence": 0.7,
  "summary": "This paper analyzes existing surveys of IEI-EMF/EHS to estimate how common restricted access to work may be in man-made electromagnetic environments. It reports assessed prevalence ranges for mild, moderate, and severe IEI-EMF/EHS in the general population and estimates that 0.65% of the general population may have restricted access to work. The abstract notes possible under-reporting and suggests workplace adjustments may help some affected individuals remain employed.",
  "key_points": [
    "The study is based on analyses of two types of surveys: general-population surveys and surveys of people with IEI-EMF/EHS.",
    "It highlights that definitions of IEI-EMF/EHS vary and may include subconscious through severe symptoms.",
    "The paper assesses evidence as indicating mild IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence of about 5.0–30% in the general population.",
    "It reports moderate IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence of about 1.5–5.0% and severe prevalence of <1.5% in the general population.",
    "It estimates restricted access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments at 0.65% of the general population.",
    "It estimates that restricted access to work affects about 18% of people with moderate IEI-EMF/EHS.",
    "The abstract discusses possible under-reporting and notes that workplace adjustments may reduce work restriction rates."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "EHS/IEI-EMF",
    "Occupational/Workplace",
    "Epidemiology/Prevalence"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity",
    "IEI-EMF",
    "Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance",
    "Workplace Accommodation",
    "Employment Restriction",
    "Prevalence Estimates",
    "Survey Analysis",
    "Man-Made Electromagnetic Exposure",
    "Disability"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "restricted access to work",
    "man-made electromagnetic environments",
    "IEI-EMF",
    "EHS",
    "prevalence",
    "survey"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "ehs",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "The paper focuses on IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence and related functional impacts."
    },
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.75,
      "reason": "It estimates restriction in access to work in electromagnetic environments and discusses workplace adjustments."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Review of survey evidence estimates IEI-EMF/EHS prevalence ranges and suggests ~0.65% of the general population may have restricted access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments (Bevington, 2019).",
    "facebook": "A 2019 paper analyzing survey evidence reports prevalence ranges for IEI-EMF/EHS and estimates that about 0.65% of the general population may have restricted access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments, with under-reporting discussed.",
    "linkedin": "Bevington (2019) analyzes survey evidence on IEI-EMF/EHS and estimates that ~0.65% of the general population may have restricted access to work in man-made electromagnetic environments, highlighting definitional variability and the potential role of workplace adjustments."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library