RF Safe

Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure"

2019 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 1639

Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure" Vijayalaxmi, Foster KR, Miyakoshi J, Verschaeve L. Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell p…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2019
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure" Vijayalaxmi, Foster KR, Miyakoshi J, Verschaeve L. Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure" by Smith-Roe at al. [online, open access, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2019]. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1002/em.22353. No abstract ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
Populationmale and female rats and mice (as referenced in commented paper)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · subchronic exposure (as referenced in commented paper)
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 44% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure" Vijayalaxmi, Foster KR, Miyakoshi J, Verschaeve L. Comments on the "Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell p…

Outcomes measured

  • genotoxicity

Limitations

  • No abstract provided; content and conclusions of the comments are not available from the provided text.
  • Exposure parameters (frequency, SAR, duration details) are not reported in the provided text.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "cell phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "subchronic exposure (as referenced in commented paper)"
  },
  "population": "male and female rats and mice (as referenced in commented paper)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "genotoxicity"
  ],
  "main_findings": null,
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No abstract provided; content and conclusions of the comments are not available from the provided text.",
    "Exposure parameters (frequency, SAR, duration details) are not reported in the provided text."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.44,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "keywords": [
    "commentary",
    "genotoxicity",
    "radiofrequency radiation",
    "cell phone",
    "rats",
    "mice",
    "subchronic exposure",
    "Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/em.22353
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library