RF Safe

November/December 2016 issue of the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology: three EMF papers

2016 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 1438

This item lists three EMF-related papers published in the November/December 2016 issue of the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, covering (1) recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people, (2) personal and bedroom ex…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2016
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

November/December 2016 issue of the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology: three EMF papers Kosuke Kiyohara, Kanako Wake, Soichi Watanabe, Takuji Arima, Yasuto Sato, Noriko Kojimahara, Masao Taki and Naohito Yamaguchi.Recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26: 566-574; advance online publication, March 18, 2015; doi:10.1038/jes.2015.13. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Benjamin Struchen, Ilaria Liorni, Marta Parazzini, Stephanie Gängler, Paolo Ravazzani and Martin Röösli. Analysis of personal and bedroom exposure to ELF-MFs in children in Italy and Switzerland. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26: 586-596; advance online publication, December 16, 2015; doi:10.1038/jes.2015.80. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Madhuri Sudan, Jørn Olsen,Torben Sigsgaard and Leeka Kheifets. Trends in cell phone use among children in the Danish national birth cohort at ages 7 and 11 years. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26: 606-612; advance online publication, March 23, 2016; doi:10.1038/jes.2016.17. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

This item lists three EMF-related papers published in the November/December 2016 issue of the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, covering (1) recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people, (2) personal and bedroom exposure to ELF magnetic fields in children in Italy and Switzerland, and (3) trends in cell phone use among children in the Danish National Birth Cohort at ages 7 and 11 years.

Limitations

  • No study methods, results, or quantitative findings are provided; the text functions as a brief issue listing/citation notice rather than an abstract of a single study.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [],
  "main_findings": "This item lists three EMF-related papers published in the November/December 2016 issue of the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, covering (1) recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people, (2) personal and bedroom exposure to ELF magnetic fields in children in Italy and Switzerland, and (3) trends in cell phone use among children in the Danish National Birth Cohort at ages 7 and 11 years.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No study methods, results, or quantitative findings are provided; the text functions as a brief issue listing/citation notice rather than an abstract of a single study."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "keywords": [
    "mobile phone calls",
    "recall accuracy",
    "ELF-MFs",
    "children",
    "personal exposure",
    "bedroom exposure",
    "cell phone use trends",
    "Danish National Birth Cohort",
    "Italy",
    "Switzerland",
    "Japan"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.05,
      "reason": "Mentions exposure assessment topics, but not clearly occupational; included with low weight due to general exposure-science context."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1038/jes.2015.13
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library