RF radiation induced genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on chickpea root tip cells

2017 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 1318

Dry chickpea seeds exposed to RF sources (GSM cell phone at 900 MHz and laptop at 3.31 GHz) for 24–48 h showed inhibited germination, decreased mitotic index, and increased abnormality index compared with untreated controls. The study reports chromosomal aber…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2017
Study typeanimal
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

RF radiation induced genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on chickpea root tip cells Sadaf Tabasum Qureshi, Sajjad Ahmed Memon, Abdul Rasool Abassi, Mahboob Ali Sial, Farooque Ali Bughio. Radiofrequency radiations induced genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) root tip cells. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017 May;24(4):883-891. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.011. Abstract Present study was under taken to predict the possible DNA damages (genotoxicity) and carcinogenicity caused by radiofrequency radiations (RF) to living tissue. Dry seeds of chickpea were treated with GSM cell phone (900 MHz) and laptop (3.31 GHz) as RF source for 24 and 48 h. Untreated seeds were used as (0 h) negative control and Gamma rays (250 Gray) as positive control. Plant chromosomal aberration assay was used as genotoxicity marker. All the treatment of RF inhibits seed germination percentage. 48 h laptop treatment has the most negative effect as compared to untreated control. A decrease was observed in mitotic index (M.I) and increase in abnormality index (A.I) with the increase in exposure duration and frequency in (Hz). Cell membrane damages were also observed only in 48 h exposure of cell phone and laptop (RF). Maximum nuclear membrane damages and ghost cells were again recorded in 48 h exposure of cell phone and laptop. The radiofrequency radiations (900 MHz and 3.31 GHz) are only genotoxic as they induce micronuclei, bi-nuclei, multi-nuclei and scattered nuclei but could be carcinogenic as 48 h incubation of RF induced fragmentation and ghost cells. Therefore cell phones and laptop should not be used unnecessarily to avoid possible genotoxic and carcinogenic effects. Conclusion It is concluded that radiofrequency radiations are genotoxic as they induced chromosomal aberrations in chickpea mitotic cells and the presence of ghost cells is clear indication of their carcinogenic potential. To avoid reported DNA damages in this work cell phones should always be used either for short duration or with hands- free for long duration and they should not be kept in pockets or near body. Laptops should not be used unnecessarily for enjoyment purpose. It must be placed on desk top rather lap to minimize their exposure to human body. Further assay of carcinogenity are recommended on mouse and human cell lines. Open access paper: sciencedirect.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionharm
PopulationChickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) root tip cells / dry seeds
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 24 and 48 h
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Dry chickpea seeds exposed to RF sources (GSM cell phone at 900 MHz and laptop at 3.31 GHz) for 24–48 h showed inhibited germination, decreased mitotic index, and increased abnormality index compared with untreated controls. The study reports chromosomal aberrations (e.g., micronuclei) and, at 48 h, membrane damage, fragmentation, and “ghost cells,” which the authors interpret as indicating genotoxicity and possible carcinogenic potential.

Outcomes measured

  • Seed germination percentage
  • Mitotic index (M.I.)
  • Abnormality index (A.I.)
  • Chromosomal aberrations (micronuclei, bi-nuclei, multi-nuclei, scattered nuclei)
  • Cell membrane damage
  • Nuclear membrane damage
  • Ghost cells
  • Fragmentation

Limitations

  • No sample size reported in the abstract.
  • Exposure metrics beyond frequency and duration (e.g., power density/SAR, distance) are not provided in the abstract.
  • Study is in a plant model (chickpea root tip cells), limiting direct relevance to human health.
  • Carcinogenicity is inferred from cellular morphology (e.g., ghost cells) rather than tumor outcomes.
  • Potential confounding from heat or other non-RF factors is not addressed in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": null,
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone, laptop",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "24 and 48 h"
  },
  "population": "Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) root tip cells / dry seeds",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Seed germination percentage",
    "Mitotic index (M.I.)",
    "Abnormality index (A.I.)",
    "Chromosomal aberrations (micronuclei, bi-nuclei, multi-nuclei, scattered nuclei)",
    "Cell membrane damage",
    "Nuclear membrane damage",
    "Ghost cells",
    "Fragmentation"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Dry chickpea seeds exposed to RF sources (GSM cell phone at 900 MHz and laptop at 3.31 GHz) for 24–48 h showed inhibited germination, decreased mitotic index, and increased abnormality index compared with untreated controls. The study reports chromosomal aberrations (e.g., micronuclei) and, at 48 h, membrane damage, fragmentation, and “ghost cells,” which the authors interpret as indicating genotoxicity and possible carcinogenic potential.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "No sample size reported in the abstract.",
    "Exposure metrics beyond frequency and duration (e.g., power density/SAR, distance) are not provided in the abstract.",
    "Study is in a plant model (chickpea root tip cells), limiting direct relevance to human health.",
    "Carcinogenicity is inferred from cellular morphology (e.g., ghost cells) rather than tumor outcomes.",
    "Potential confounding from heat or other non-RF factors is not addressed in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "concern",
  "stance_confidence": 0.86,
  "summary": "This plant study exposed dry chickpea seeds to RF sources (900 MHz GSM phone and 3.31 GHz laptop) for 24 or 48 hours and assessed genotoxicity using a chromosomal aberration assay. The authors report reduced germination, decreased mitotic index, increased abnormality index, and nuclear/cellular abnormalities including micronuclei. They interpret fragmentation and “ghost cells” after 48 hours as suggesting possible carcinogenic potential and recommend limiting unnecessary device use.",
  "key_points": [
    "RF exposure was applied using a GSM cell phone (900 MHz) and a laptop (3.31 GHz) for 24 and 48 hours.",
    "Untreated seeds served as negative controls and gamma rays (250 Gray) as a positive control.",
    "All RF treatments reportedly inhibited seed germination compared with controls, with the 48-hour laptop exposure described as most negative.",
    "Mitotic index decreased and abnormality index increased with longer exposure duration and higher frequency.",
    "Chromosomal aberrations such as micronuclei, bi-nuclei, multi-nuclei, and scattered nuclei were reported after RF exposure.",
    "Cell and nuclear membrane damage, fragmentation, and “ghost cells” were reported mainly at 48-hour exposures.",
    "The authors conclude RF was genotoxic in this assay and suggest possible carcinogenicity based on observed cellular changes."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "RF",
    "Mobile Phones",
    "Wi-Fi & Wireless Devices",
    "Genotoxicity",
    "Plants/In Vitro"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Radiofrequency Radiation",
    "Genotoxicity",
    "Chromosomal Aberrations",
    "Micronuclei",
    "Chickpea",
    "Root Tip Cells",
    "Seed Germination",
    "Mitotic Index",
    "Cell Membrane Damage",
    "Nuclear Membrane Damage",
    "Ghost Cells",
    "GSM 900 MHz",
    "Laptop Exposure",
    "3.31 GHz"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF",
    "genotoxicity",
    "carcinogenicity",
    "chickpea",
    "Cicer arietinum",
    "root tip cells",
    "chromosomal aberration assay",
    "micronuclei",
    "mitotic index",
    "abnormality index",
    "900 MHz GSM cell phone"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "cell-phones",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Exposure source includes a GSM cell phone at 900 MHz."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Plant study: chickpea seeds exposed to RF from a 900 MHz GSM phone or a 3.31 GHz laptop for 24–48 h showed reduced germination and increased chromosomal abnormalities; authors interpret findings as genotoxic and possibly carcinogenic at 48 h.",
    "facebook": "A study in chickpea root tip cells exposed seeds to RF from a 900 MHz GSM phone and a 3.31 GHz laptop for 24–48 hours. The authors report inhibited germination, reduced mitotic activity, and chromosomal abnormalities (e.g., micronuclei), interpreting the results as genotoxic and possibly carcinogenic at longer exposure.",
    "linkedin": "In a plant chromosomal aberration assay, chickpea seeds exposed to RF sources (900 MHz GSM phone; 3.31 GHz laptop) for 24–48 h showed reduced germination, lower mitotic index, and increased nuclear/cellular abnormalities. Authors conclude genotoxicity in this model and suggest possible carcinogenic potential at 48 h based on observed fragmentation/ghost cells."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.011
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library