The Effect of Continuous Low-Intensity Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Radio Base Stations to Cancer Mortality in Brazil

2021 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 1216

The study reports that higher radio base station (RBS) radiofrequency exposure was associated with higher cancer mortality in adjusted analyses. The highest adjusted risk reported was for cervix cancer (rate ratio = 2.18). Spatial analysis identified a southe…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2021
Study typeecological
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The Effect of Continuous Low-Intensity Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Radio Base Stations to Cancer Mortality in Brazil Nádia Cristina Pinheiro Rodrigues, Adilza Condessa Dode, Mônica Kramer de Noronha Andrade, Gisele O'Dwyer, Denise Leite Maia Monteiro, Inês Nascimento Carvalho Reis, Roberto Pinheiro Rodrigues, Vera Cecília Frossard, Valéria Teresa Saraiva Lino. The Effect of Continuous Low-Intensity Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Radio Base Stations to Cancer Mortality in Brazil. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1229. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031229. Abstract Background: this study aims to estimate the rate of death by cancer as a result of Radio Base Station (RBS) radiofrequency exposure, especially for breast, cervix, lung, and esophagus cancers. Methods: we collected information on the number of deaths by cancer, gender, age group, gross domestic product per capita, death year, and the amount of exposure over a lifetime. We investigated all cancer types and some specific types (breast, cervix, lung, and esophagus cancers). Results: in capitals where RBS radiofrequency exposure was higher than 2000/antennas-year, the average mortality rate was 112/100,000 for all cancers. The adjusted analysis showed that, the higher the exposure to RBS radiofrequency, the higher cancer mortality was. The highest adjusted risk was observed for cervix cancer (rate ratio = 2.18). The spatial analysis showed that the highest RBS radiofrequency exposure was observed in a city in southern Brazil that also showed the highest mortality rate for all types of cancer and specifically for lung and breast cancer. Conclusion: the balance of our results indicates that exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from RBS increases the rate of death for all types of cancer. Open access paper: mdpi.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeecological
Effect directionharm
PopulationResidents in Brazilian state capitals (mortality data analyzed by city)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · continuous low-intensity; lifetime exposure (as described)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The study reports that higher radio base station (RBS) radiofrequency exposure was associated with higher cancer mortality in adjusted analyses. The highest adjusted risk reported was for cervix cancer (rate ratio = 2.18). Spatial analysis identified a southern Brazilian city with both the highest RBS exposure and the highest mortality rates for all cancers and for lung and breast cancer.

Outcomes measured

  • Cancer mortality (all cancers)
  • Breast cancer mortality
  • Cervix cancer mortality
  • Lung cancer mortality
  • Esophagus cancer mortality

Limitations

  • Ecological design (city-level exposure and outcomes), which can be subject to ecological fallacy
  • Exposure metric described as antennas-year rather than individual-level RF measurements
  • Potential residual confounding despite adjustment (only limited covariates listed in abstract)
  • Causality cannot be established from the described observational approach
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2021,
  "study_type": "ecological",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "base station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "continuous low-intensity; lifetime exposure (as described)"
  },
  "population": "Residents in Brazilian state capitals (mortality data analyzed by city)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Cancer mortality (all cancers)",
    "Breast cancer mortality",
    "Cervix cancer mortality",
    "Lung cancer mortality",
    "Esophagus cancer mortality"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The study reports that higher radio base station (RBS) radiofrequency exposure was associated with higher cancer mortality in adjusted analyses. The highest adjusted risk reported was for cervix cancer (rate ratio = 2.18). Spatial analysis identified a southern Brazilian city with both the highest RBS exposure and the highest mortality rates for all cancers and for lung and breast cancer.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Ecological design (city-level exposure and outcomes), which can be subject to ecological fallacy",
    "Exposure metric described as antennas-year rather than individual-level RF measurements",
    "Potential residual confounding despite adjustment (only limited covariates listed in abstract)",
    "Causality cannot be established from the described observational approach"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "concern",
  "stance_confidence": 0.86,
  "summary": "This ecological study in Brazil examined whether higher radiofrequency exposure from radio base stations is associated with cancer mortality, including specific cancers (breast, cervix, lung, and esophagus). It reports that higher RBS exposure was associated with higher cancer mortality in adjusted analyses, with the highest adjusted risk reported for cervix cancer (rate ratio 2.18). The authors conclude that RBS radiofrequency exposure increases cancer death rates, though the design is city-level and does not establish individual-level causation.",
  "key_points": [
    "The study evaluates associations between radio base station (RBS) radiofrequency exposure and cancer mortality in Brazil.",
    "It analyzes all cancers combined and specific cancers: breast, cervix, lung, and esophagus.",
    "Higher RBS exposure (e.g., >2000 antennas-year) is reported alongside higher average all-cancer mortality rates.",
    "Adjusted analyses are described as showing increasing cancer mortality with increasing RBS exposure.",
    "The highest adjusted risk reported is for cervix cancer (rate ratio 2.18).",
    "Spatial analysis identified a city with both the highest RBS exposure and the highest mortality for all cancers and for lung and breast cancer.",
    "The authors interpret the overall balance of results as indicating increased cancer mortality with RBS exposure."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "Epidemiology",
    "Cancer",
    "RF Exposure",
    "Base Stations"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Radio Base Stations",
    "Radiofrequency Exposure",
    "Cancer Mortality",
    "Ecological Study",
    "Spatial Analysis",
    "Brazil",
    "Cervix Cancer",
    "Breast Cancer",
    "Lung Cancer",
    "Esophagus Cancer"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "radio base station",
    "radiofrequency",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "cancer mortality",
    "Brazil",
    "ecological",
    "spatial analysis",
    "rate ratio"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Ecological study (Brazil) reports higher cancer mortality in cities with higher radio base station RF exposure, with the highest adjusted risk reported for cervix cancer (RR 2.18).",
    "facebook": "An ecological analysis of Brazilian capitals reports that higher radio base station radiofrequency exposure is associated with higher cancer mortality, including elevated risk estimates for specific cancers such as cervix cancer (RR 2.18).",
    "linkedin": "This ecological study in Brazil reports an association between higher radio base station radiofrequency exposure and higher cancer mortality in adjusted analyses, including a reported cervix cancer rate ratio of 2.18 and supporting spatial patterns."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031229
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library